...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Re: Han J-S. Acupuncture analgesia: areas of consensus and controversy. Pain 2011; 152(3S): S41-8.
【24h】

Re: Han J-S. Acupuncture analgesia: areas of consensus and controversy. Pain 2011; 152(3S): S41-8.

机译:回复:韩建勋。针灸镇痛:共识和争议领域。 2011年痛苦; 152(3S):S41-8。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article by Ji-Sheng Han [1] was aimed at summarizing the areas of consensus and controversy in acupuncture research. The author does not tell us how he judged any issue to be a "consensus" or a "controversy." Are we to assume that the whole article is based on his own personal judgments, beliefs, or prejudices? Looking at his "areas of consensus," one can only assume that this is so. How many unbiased experts would, for instance, agree with the "consensus" that "acupuncture has both local and distant analgesic effects..."? I had assumed that the era of "one man consensus" in medicine had long gone; after reading this article, one can only conclude that I was wrong.
机译:韩继胜[1]的文章旨在总结针灸研究的共识和争议领域。作者没有告诉我们他如何判断任何问题是“共识”还是“争议”。我们是否要假设整篇文章都是基于他个人的判断,信念或偏见?纵观他的“共识领域”,人们只能假设是这样。例如,有多少公正的专家会同意“针灸既有局部镇痛作用又有远距离止痛作用……”的“共识”?我以为医学上“一个人达成共识”的时代已经过去了。看完这篇文章后,只能得出我错了的结论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pain.》 |2011年第6期|共1页
  • 作者

    Ernst E;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 诊断学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号