...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Winners and losers of organic cereal farming in animal communities across Central and Northern Europe
【24h】

Winners and losers of organic cereal farming in animal communities across Central and Northern Europe

机译:中欧和北欧动物社区有机谷物农业的赢家和输家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organic farming is promoted as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming, with positive effects on the diversity of plants and selected animal taxa. Here, we used a literature survey to collect presence/absence data on the composition of farmland bird, ground beetle, spider as well as butterfly and moth communities from 28 independent studies to identify genera and (sub-)families that had either higher (winners) or lower (losers) species richness under organic farming. We further tested if the taxonomic breadth of communities and the number of species of conservation concern differed between farming systems and if climate or fertilization intensity altered responses of animal communities to organic farming. Our results suggest that there are both winners and losers of organic farming and that this effect depends on whether taxa are predaceous (losers) or exclusively feed on plant material (winners). Organic farming did not lead to a higher number of exclusive species, but significantly more species of conservation concern were observed under organic farming. Organic farming consistently led to a slightly higher taxonomic breadth of bird communities. Finally, we did not find support that local long-term climatic conditions or differences in fertilization rates between farming systems altered the effect of organic farming. Overall, we did not find strong support for general positive effects of organic farming on animal diversity in the analysed groups across Central and Northern Europe
机译:提倡有机耕作作为传统耕作的可持续替代方式,对植物的多样性和某些动物分类群产生积极影响。在这里,我们使用了一项文献调查,从28项独立研究中收集了有关农田鸟类,地上甲虫,蜘蛛以及蝴蝶和蛾类群落组成的有无数据,以鉴定属(高)的属和(亚)科)或更低(失败者)的有机耕种物种丰富度。我们进一步测试了社区之间的分类学广度和关注的物种数量在耕作系统之间是否存在差异,以及气候或施肥强度是否改变了动物群落对有机耕作的反应。我们的结果表明,有机农业既有赢家也有输家,而这种影响取决于分类单元是早产的(输家)还是仅以植物材料为食(赢家)。有机耕作并没有导致更多的专有物种,但是在有机耕作下观察到的保护物种明显更多。有机耕作始终导致鸟类群落的分类学宽度略高。最后,我们没有发现支持当地的长期气候条件或耕作制度之间施肥率的差异改变了有机耕作的效果。总体而言,在中欧和北欧的分析群体中,我们没有发现有力的支持有机农业对动物多样性的总体积极影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号