首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Electromagnetic interference from a muscle stimulation device causing discharge of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: epicardial bipolar and endocardial bipolar sensing circuits are compared (see comments)
【24h】

Electromagnetic interference from a muscle stimulation device causing discharge of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: epicardial bipolar and endocardial bipolar sensing circuits are compared (see comments)

机译:来自肌肉刺激设备的电磁干扰导致植入式心脏复律除颤器放电:比较了心外膜双极和心内膜双极感测电路(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This case report is about two patients with two different types of ICDs who underwent electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) therapy. In one patient with an ICD that has epicardial screw-in bipolar sensing leads, electromagnetic interference (EMI) from the EMS device caused the delivery of an inappropriate ICD discharge. In a second patient with an ICD with endocardial true bipolar sensing, there was no evidence of EMI during the EMS therapy despite all of our attempts to reproduce it. The sensing circuits in the two different ICDs are compared.
机译:该病例报告约有两名患有两种不同类型ICD的患者接受了电肌肉刺激(EMS)治疗。在一名患有心外膜旋入式双极感应导线的ICD患者中,来自EMS设备的电磁干扰(EMI)导致了不适当的ICD放电。在第二例具有心内膜真正双极感应的ICD的患者中,尽管我们进行了所有尝试,但在EMS治疗期间均未发现EMI。比较了两个不同ICD中的感测电路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号