...
【24h】

Makena or compounded 17P?

机译:Makena还是复合式17P?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I read with great interest the article in the July issue of P&T, entitled "Controversies in Practice," by Drs. Patel and Rumore regarding weekly injections of 17P for the prevention of pre-term birth.1 Lacking, sadly, was a return on investment (ROI) comparison as well as a summary of the facts surrounding this controversy. Had those been included, I am confident that the authors would have arrived at a very different conclusion. Absent that, they came up with a costly recommendation that accrues no proven additional health care benefit.
机译:我非常感兴趣地阅读了Ps博士在7月号上发表的题为“实践中的争议”的文章。帕特尔(Patel)和鲁莫尔(Rumore)关于每周注射17P预防早产。1遗憾的是,缺乏投资回报率(ROI)以及对该争议的事实进行了总结。如果将这些内容包括在内,我相信作者将得出截然不同的结论。缺席的是,他们提出了一项代价高昂的建议,没有产生任何已证明的额外医疗保健好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号