首页> 外文期刊>Steel & Composite Structures: An International Journal >Seismic response analysis of steel frames with post-Northridge connection
【24h】

Seismic response analysis of steel frames with post-Northridge connection

机译:后北岭连接的钢框架的地震响应分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The seismic behavior of two steel moment-resisting frames, which satisfy all the current seismic design requirements, are evaluated and compared in the presence of pre-Northridge connections denoted as BWWF and an improved post-Northridge connections denoted as BWWF-AD. Pre-Northridge connections are modeled first as fully restrained (FR) type. Then they are considered to be partially restrained (PR) to model their behavior more realistically. The unproved post-Northridge connections are modeled as PR type, as proposed by the authors. A sophisticated nonlinear tune-domain finite element program developed by the authors is used for the response evaluation of the frames in terms of the overall rotation of the connections and the maximum drift. The frames are excited by ten recorded earthquake time histories. These time histories are then scaled up to produce some relevant response characteristics. The behaviors of the frames are studied comprehensively with the help of 120 analyses. Following important observations are made. The frames produced essentially similar rotation and drift for the connections modeled as FR type and PR type represented by BWWF-AD indicating that the presence of slots in the web of beams in BWWF-AD is not detrimental to the overall response behavior. When the lateral displacements of the frames are significantly large, the responses are improved if BWWF-AD type connections are used in the frames. This study analytically confirms many desirable features of BWWF-AD connections. PR frames have longer periods of vibration in comparison to FR frames and may attract lower inertia forces. However, calculated periods of the frames of this study using FEMA 350 empirical equation is longer than those calculated using dynamic characteristics of the frames. This may result in even lower design forces and may adversely influence the design.
机译:在存在表示为BWWF的北岭前连接和表示为BWWF-AD的改进后的Northridge连接的情况下,评估并比较了两个满足所有当前抗震设计要求的钢制抗弯框架的地震性能。先将北岭预连接建模为完全约束(FR)类型。然后,他们被认为是部分约束(PR)以便更实际地建模其行为。作者建议将未经验证的北岭后连接建模为PR类型。作者开发的一种复杂的非线性调谐域有限元程序用于根据连接的整体旋转和最大漂移对框架进行响应评估。十个记录的地震时间历史记录激发了这些框架。然后将这些时间历史按比例放大以产生一些相关的响应特征。借助120次分析全面研究了框架的行为。以下是重要的观察。对于以BWWF-AD表示的FR型和PR型建模的连接,框架产生了基本相似的旋转和漂移,表明BWWF-AD中的梁腹中缝隙的存在对整体响应性能无害。当框架的横向位移很大时,如果在框架中使用BWWF-AD型连接,则响应会得到改善。这项研究从分析上证实了BWWF-AD连接的许多理想功能。与FR框架相比,PR框架具有更长的振动周期,并且可能吸引较低的惯性力。但是,使用FEMA 350经验公式计算的本研究框架的周期比使用框架的动态特性计算的周期更长。这可能导致更低的设计力,并可能对设计产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号