首页> 外文期刊>Studia Logica >Logic and Reasoning: do the facts matter?
【24h】

Logic and Reasoning: do the facts matter?

机译:逻辑与推理:事实重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Modern logic is undergoing a cognitive turn, side-stepping Frege's 'anti-psychologism'. Collaborations between logicians and colleagues in more empirical fieldsare growing, especially in research on reasoning and information update by intelligentagents. We place this border-crossing research in the context of long-standing contactsbetween logic and empirical facts, since pure normativity has never been a plausible stance.We also discuss what the fall of Frege's Wall means for a new agenda of logic as a theoryof rational agency, and what might then be a viable understanding of 'psychologism' as afriend rather than an enemy of logical theory.
机译:现代逻辑正在经历认知转向,避开了弗雷格(Frege)的“反心理主义”。逻辑学家和同事之间在更多经验领域的合作正在增长,特别是在智能代理推理和信息更新的研究中。由于纯粹的规范性从来都不是合理的立场,因此我们将这种跨界研究置于逻辑与经验事实之间的长期联系的背景下。我们还讨论了弗雷格墙的倒塌对于作为理性理论的新逻辑议程意味着什么代理,然后对“心理主义”作为朋友而不是逻辑理论的敌人的切实理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号