...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Bariatric Surgery Costs and Implications for Hospital Margins: Comparing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Gastric Banding.
【24h】

Bariatric Surgery Costs and Implications for Hospital Margins: Comparing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Gastric Banding.

机译:减肥手术的费用及其对医院的影响:比较腹腔镜胃旁路手术和腹腔镜胃绑扎术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Effective cost reduction strategies require effective analyses of charges. METHODS: Costs and charges for laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric banding were compared. Equipment costs, both disposable and reusable, were obtained. Data on the total charges, anesthesiology charges, and hospital charges were obtained; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Disposable equipment costs for laparoscopic gastric bypass totaled Dollars 3516.23, for laparoscopic gastric banding they were Dollars 4363; the difference stemmed from the Dollars 3195 laparoscopic band. Median total charges for the procedures differed by less than Dollars 100 (P=0.81). Hospital charges for gastric bypass were about Dollars 275 (P=0.087) more for bypass than for banding. CONCLUSIONS: Effective cost reduction strategies require cost analyses of each individual procedure; results for one procedure cannot necessarily be generalized to another procedure even if overall costs do not differ.
机译:背景:有效的成本降低策略需要对费用进行有效的分析。方法:比较了腹腔镜胃旁路术和腹腔镜胃束带术的费用。获得了一次性和可重复使用的设备成本。获得了总费用,麻醉费用和医院费用的数据;进行了单变量和多变量分析。结果:腹腔镜胃搭桥术的一次性设备费用总计为3516.23美元,腹腔镜胃绑带术的一次性设备费用为4363美元;差异源于Dollars 3195腹腔镜带。该程序的总费用中位数相差不到100美元(P = 0.81)。胃旁路手术的住院费用比束带手术高出约275美元(P = 0.087)。结论:有效的成本削减策略要求对每个程序进行成本分析。即使总成本没有差异,一个过程的结果也不一定能推广到另一过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号