首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy.
【24h】

Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy.

机译:腹腔镜经脐单孔阑尾切除术:初步经验并与三孔阑尾切除术进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy usually needs 3 ports, 1 for the videoscope and 2 as working channels. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy with conventional three-port appendectomy. METHODS: From October 2008 to January 2009, 35 patients underwent single-port appendectomy (SA). Surgical outcomes such as operation time, number of times of parenteral analgesic injected, complication, and hospital stay of 35 patients receiving SA were analyzed and compared with those of 37 patients receiving three-port appendectomy (TA) during the same period. RESULTS: Comparing SA with TA, there were no statistically significant differences in operation time (75.9+/-27.4 vs. 66.4+/-21.7 min), times of injected analgesic (0.86+/-1.3 vs. 0.97+/-1.47 times), complication rate (8.6% vs. 2.7%), and hospital stay (3.0+/-1.3 vs. 3.2+/-1.4 d). The most common complication was wound infection (2 cases for SA and 1 for TA). One instance of intra-abdominal fluid accumulation occurred in a patient with perforated appendicitis during SA, and this was managed with image-guided drainage. In contrast to the TA, the abdominal scar in SA was nearly inconspicuous. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed SA to be feasible, and it did not show any difference in postoperative outcomes compared with TA. Moreover, SA can produce scarless surgery without the need for specialized instrumentation.
机译:目的:腹腔镜阑尾切除术通常需要3个端口,其中1个用于视频镜,2个作为工作通道。这项研究的目的是比较腹腔镜经脐单孔阑尾切除术与常规三孔阑尾切除术的可行性和术后结果。方法:从2008年10月至2009年1月,有35例患者接受了单端口阑尾切除术(SA)。分析了35例接受SA的患者的手术时间,手术时间,注射肠外镇痛的次数,并发症和住院时间,并将其与同期37例接受三端口阑尾切除术(TA)的患者进行了比较。结果:将SA与TA进行比较,手术时间(75.9 +/- 27.4与66.4 +/- 21.7分钟),注射镇痛剂的时间(0.86 +/- 1.3与0.97 +/- 1.47倍)无统计学差异。 ),并发症发生率(8.6%对2.7%)和住院时间(3.0 +/- 1.3对3.2 +/- 1.4 d)。最常见的并发症是伤口感染(SA 2例,TA 1例)。 SA期间一名穿孔阑尾炎患者发生腹腔积液,这是通过影像引导引流进行处理的。与TA相比,SA的腹部瘢痕几乎不明显。结论:本研究表明SA是可行的,与TA相比,术后结局没有任何差异。而且,SA可以进行无疤手术,而无需专门的仪器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号