首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Intraoperative fluoroscopy vs. intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for early colorectal cancer localization in laparoscopic surgery.
【24h】

Intraoperative fluoroscopy vs. intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for early colorectal cancer localization in laparoscopic surgery.

机译:腹腔镜手术中术中透视与术中腹腔镜超声检查对早期结直肠癌定位的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, precise tumor localization is important for oncologically correct surgery and adequate tumor and lymph node resection margins. During laparoscopic surgery it is difficult to localize early CRC. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of two tumor localization techniques; intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography. METHODS: Seventeen patients with CRC necessitating preoperative marking were alternately allocated to either the fluoroscopy (F) group (n = 8) or the laparoscopic ultrasonography (LU) group (n = 9). A three-step technique was used. At first lesions were localized preoperatively by metallic clips that were colonoscopically applied proximally and distally to the tumor site. Second, computed tomography (CT) colonography was taken to obtain preoperative staging. The location of the metallic clips was confirmed by CT colonography, preoperatively. Third, in the F group, intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed to localize the applied clips. In the LU group, the applied clips were detected from the serosal aspect of the colon using intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography. RESULTS: In all patients, colonoscopic metallic clips were successfully applied and preoperative CT colonography correctly detected the location of the tumor. Marking sites were detected precisely using intraoperative fluoroscopy or intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography in all cases, without complications. The mean detection time was 15.8 minutes in the F group and 7.0 minutes in the LU group (p = 0.005). In the LU group, two cases were technically difficult because of interruption of the ultrasound by intestinal air. CONCLUSIONS: Both intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography are safe and accurate techniques for intraoperative localization of early CRC. With regard to detection time, intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography is superior to intraoperative fluoroscopy. However, when there is a massive amount of intestinal air, intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography is cumbersome in localizing the lesion. Computed tomography colonography is useful for preoperative tumor localization and might be effective for shortening detection time during surgery.
机译:背景:在大肠癌(CRC)手术中,精确的肿瘤定位对于肿瘤学上正确的手术以及足够的肿瘤和淋巴结切除切缘至关重要。在腹腔镜手术期间,很难定位早期CRC。这项研究的目的是比较两种肿瘤定位技术的有效性。术中透视和术中腹腔镜超声检查。方法:17例需要术前标记的CRC患者被交替分配至透视(F)组(n = 8)或腹腔镜超声(LU)组(n = 9)。使用了三步技术。最初,术前用金属夹将病变定位在结肠上,在结肠镜下向近端和远端应用到肿瘤部位。其次,进行计算机断层扫描(CT)结肠造影以获得术前分期。术前通过CT结肠造影确认了金属夹的位置。第三,在F组中,术中进行透视检查以定位所施加的夹子。在LU组中,使用术中腹腔镜超声检查从结肠的浆膜方面检测出所应用的夹子。结果:所有患者均成功应用了结肠镜金属夹,术前CT结肠造影正确地检测了肿瘤的位置。在所有情况下,均使用术中荧光检查或术中腹腔镜超声检查准确地检测到标记部位,而无并发症。 F组的平均检测时间为15.8分钟,LU组的平均检测时间为7.0分钟(p = 0.005)。在LU组中,有2例由于肠道空气中断超声而在技术上困难。结论:术中透视和术中腹腔镜超声检查均是早期CRC术中定位的安全准确的技术。关于检测时间,术中腹腔镜超声检查优于术中荧光检查。然而,当有大量的肠道空气时,术中腹腔镜超声检查难以确定病灶的位置。计算机断层扫描结肠造影术可用于术前肿瘤定位,并可能有效缩短手术期间的检测时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号