首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair.
【24h】

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair.

机译:腹腔镜腹腔内聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)修复疝气腹。与开放式筋膜前聚丙烯网修补比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch (LIPP) repair of a ventral hernia is superior to open prefascial polypropylene mesh (OPPM) repair in a tertiary care university hospital in an urban environment. METHODS: Data on 39 consecutive patients undergoing either LIPP repair (n = 21) or OPPM repair (n = 18) were compared. RESULTS: Findings showed that LIPP repair is characterized by less painful recovery and shorter hospital stay, with 90% of patients treated successfully as outpatients as compared with 7% in the OPPM group. The total facility costs for the LIPP repair (
机译:背景:本研究的目的是确定在城市环境中的三级医疗大学医院,腹腔镜腹腔内聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)假体修补(LIPP)修补术是否优于开放式筋膜前聚丙烯网(OPPM)修补术。方法:比较了连续39例接受LIPP修补(n = 21)或OPPM修补(n = 18)的患者的数据。结果:研究结果表明,LIPP修复的特点是疼痛恢复少且住院时间短,成功将90%的患者作为门诊患者进行治疗,而OPPM组则为7%。 LIPP维修的总设备成本(

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号