...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model.
【24h】

Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model.

机译:腔内手术三角剖分:使用新型柔性内窥镜手术平台克服结肠内窥镜黏膜下剥离的挑战:在猪模型中的可行性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging as a result of the limited ability of conventional endoscopic instruments to achieve traction and exposure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of colonic ESD in a porcine model using a novel endoscopic surgical platform, the Anubiscope (Karl Storz, Tüttlingen, Germany), equipped with two working channels for surgical instruments with four degrees of freedom offering surgical triangulation.Nine ESDs were performed by a surgeon without any ESD experience in three swine, at 25, 15, and 10 cm above the anal verge with the Anubiscope. Sixteen ESDs were performed by an experienced endoscopist in five swine using conventional endoscopic instruments. Major ESD steps included the following for both groups: scoring the area, submucosal injection of glycerol, precut, and submucosal dissection. Outcomes measured were as follows: dissection time and speed, specimen size, en bloc dissection, and complications.No perforations occurred in the Anubis group, while there were eight perforations (50 %) in the conventional group (p = 0.02). Complete and en bloc dissections were achieved in all cases in the Anubis group. Mean dissection time for completed cases was statistically significantly shorter in the Anubis group (32.3 ± 16.1 vs. 55.87 ± 7.66 min; p = 0.0019). Mean specimen size was higher in the conventional group (1321 ± 230 vs. 927.77 ± 229.96 mm(2); p = 0.003), but mean dissection speed was similar (35.95 ± 18.93 vs. 23.98 ± 5.02 mm(2)/min in the Anubis and conventional groups, respectively; p = 0.1).Colonic ESDs were feasible in pig models with the Anubiscope. This surgical endoscopic platform is promising for endoluminal surgical procedures such as ESD, as it is user-friendly, effective, and safe.
机译:由于常规内窥镜器械实现牵引和暴露的能力有限,因此结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是使用新型内镜手术平台Anubiscope(Karl Storz,德国蒂特林根,德国)配备一个带有两个工作通道的手术器械,以四个自由度为手术器械评估猪ESD在猪模型中的可行性。由三名猪在没有肛门操作经验的情况下,用Anubiscope在肛门边缘上方25、15和10厘米处进行了9次ESD手术,没有任何ESD经验。经验丰富的内镜医师使用常规内窥镜仪器对五头猪进行了十六次ESD。两组的主要ESD步骤均包括以下步骤:对区域进行评分,甘油的粘膜下注射,预切和粘膜下剥离。测量的结果如下:解剖时间和速度,标本大小,整体解剖和并发症。Anubis组未发生穿孔,而常规组有八个穿孔(50%)(p = 0.02)。 Anubis组在所有情况下均完成了完整解剖。 Anubis组完成病例的平均解剖时间明显缩短(32.3±16.1 vs. 55.87±7.66 min; p = 0.0019)。常规组的平均标本尺寸更高(1321±230 vs. 927.77±229.96 mm(2); p = 0.003),但平均解剖速度相似(35.95±18.93 vs. 23.98±5.02 mm(2)/ min分别是Anubis组和常规组; p = 0.1)。使用Anubiscope在猪模型中进行结肠ESD是可行的。该手术内窥镜平台用户友好,有效且安全,因此有望用于腔内手术,例如ESD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号