...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >A comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors
【24h】

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors

机译:内镜全层切除与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗小肠胃肠道间质瘤的疗效和安全性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAC) is an alternative to open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), a recently developed procedure, is increasingly used to resect GISTs originated from the muscularis propria. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare EFTR with LAC as minimally invasive treatments for GISTs, especially those with a diameter < 2 cm, originating from the muscularis propria. Moreover, we evaluated the clinical efficacy, safety, and feasibility of EFTR for GISTs.
机译:腹腔镜辅助手术(LAC)是胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的开放手术的替代方法。内窥镜全层切除术(EFTR)是一种最近开发的方法,越来越多地用于切除源自固有肌层的GIST。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在将EFTR与LAC作为GIST的微创治疗方法进行比较,尤其是直径小于2 cm的源自固有肌层的GIST。此外,我们评估了EFTR对GIST的临床疗效,安全性和可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号