...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level
【24h】

Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level

机译:专家级观察性临床人类可靠性分析(OCHRA)用于腹腔镜结直肠外科手术能力评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There are no valid and reliable tools to assess competency in advanced laparoscopic surgery at a specialist level. The observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) may have the required characteristics of such a tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate construct and concurrent validity of OCHRA for competency assessment at a specialist level. Methods: Thirty-two video-recorded laparoscopic colorectal resections, performed by experts and delegates of the National Training Program in England, were evaluated. Each video was analysed using OCHRA by identifying errors enacted during surgery. The number of tissue-handling, instrument-misuse, and consequential errors was recorded using video-rating software. Times spent on dissecting (D) and on exposing (E) tissues were also measured (D/E ratio). In addition, two independent expert surgeons globally assessed each video regarding competency (pass vs. fail). Logistic regression was used to predict outcomes. Results: A total of 399 errors were identified. There was a significant difference when comparing the expert, pass, and fail groups for total errors (median counts for experts = 4, pass = 10, fail = 17; P < 0.001). When comparing the pass and fail groups excluding experts, differences could be found for tissue-handling errors (7 vs. 12; P = 0.005), but not for consequential errors (4 vs. 7; P = 0.059) and instrument-handling errors (4 vs. 5; P = 0.320). The D/E ratio was significantly lower for delegates than for experts (0.6 vs. 1.0; P = 0.001). When all four independent variables were used to predict delegates who passed or failed, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.867, sensitivity was 71.4%, and specificity was 90.9%. Conclusion: OCHRA is a valid tool for assessing competency at a specialist level in advanced laparoscopic surgery. It has the potential to be used for recertification and revalidation of specialists.
机译:背景:目前尚无有效且可靠的工具来评估专家级高级腹腔镜手术的能力。观察性临床人类可靠性分析(OCHRA)可能具有此类工具所需的特性。这项研究的目的是评估OCHRA在专家水平上的能力评估的结构和同时有效性。方法:对由英国国家培训计划的专家和代表进行的32例腹腔镜大肠切除术录像进行了评估。使用OCHRA通过识别手术过程中出现的错误来分析每个视频。使用视频评估软件记录了组织处理,器械滥用和相应错误的数量。还测量了解剖(D)和暴露(E)组织所花费的时间(D / E比)。此外,全球有两名独立的专家外科医生评估了每个视频的能力(通过与否)。 Logistic回归用于预测结果。结果:总共确定了399个错误。比较专家组,合格组和失败组的总错误率存在显着差异(专家的中位数为4,合格= 10,失败= 17; P <0.001)。比较不包括专家的合格组和失败组时,可以发现组织处理错误(7比12; P = 0.005)的差异,但结果错误(4 vs. 7; P = 0.059)和仪器处理错误的差异不大。 (4比5; P = 0.320)。与会代表的D / E比率明显低于专家(0.6对1.0; P = 0.001)。当使用所有四个自变量来预测通过或失败的代表时,接收器工作特征曲线下的面积为0.867,灵敏度为71.4%,特异性为90.9%。结论:OCHRA是评估高级腹腔镜手术专家水平能力的有效工具。它有潜力用于专家的重新认证和重新验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号