...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: A systematic review
【24h】

Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: A systematic review

机译:达芬奇辅助机器人手术的经济评价:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) is frequently used when a new and expensive technology is being introduced into clinical practice. This certainly is the case with the da Vinci surgical robot, with costs ranging from $1 to $2.5 million for each unit. This systematic review documents major variability in the reported cost evaluation studies of da Vinci robot-assisted operations compared with those performed by the direct manual laparoscopic approach. Methods: Published studies in the English language related to the period 2000-2010 were searched using economic and clinical electronic databases. Results: All 11 reports included some form of cost analysis, which made it possible for the authors to extract information on certain specific economic outcomes: operating room time, hospital stay, and total costs. With the exception of two studies, the reported operating room time was higher with the robotic approach than with manual laparoscopic surgery, and the hospital stay was the same for the two techniques. Robotic surgery is significantly more expensive if the purchase and maintenance costs of the robot system are included in the total costs. Only 3 of the 11 publications included these costs. Conclusions: The disadvantage of robotic surgery is its higher costs related to purchase and maintenance of technology and its longer operating room time. However, emerging evidence shows that operating room time decreases with experience using the robot. From the HTA viewpoint, the result of this review is that the jury still is out on the HTA of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery.
机译:背景:将新技术和昂贵的技术引入临床实践时,经常使用健康技术评估(HTA)。达芬奇外科手术机器人肯定就是这种情况,每个单元的成本从1美元到250万美元不等。该系统综述记录了达芬奇机器人辅助手术与直接人工腹腔镜手术所进行的成本评估研究相比所发生的主要差异。方法:使用经济和临床电子数据库检索与2000-2010年期间英语相关的已发表研究。结果:所有11份报告均包括某种形式的成本分析,这使作者有可能提取有关某些特定经济结果的信息:手术室时间,住院时间和总成本。除两项研究外,机器人手术的报告手术时间要比人工腹腔镜手术的手术时间更长,两种技术的住院时间相同。如果将机器人系统的购买和维护成本包括在总成本中,则机器人手术的成本会大大提高。 11种出版物中只有3种包括了这些费用。结论:机器人手术的缺点是与技术购买和维护相关的费用较高,并且手术室时间较长。但是,越来越多的证据表明,随着使用机器人的经验的增加,手术室的时间会减少。从HTA的角度来看,本次审查的结果是,陪审团仍未对达芬奇辅助机器人手术的HTA做出裁决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号