首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Long-term comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.
【24h】

Long-term comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.

机译:腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术和开放性远端胃切除术治疗晚期胃癌的长期比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Gordon et al. [1] examined 201 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The primary goal of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (LADG) and to compare those outcomes with patients who underwent open surgery (ODG). There were no significant differences in overall survival or number of collected lymph nodes between two groups. The short-term outcomes, including postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, and intra-operative blood loss, were better in the LADG group. On this basis, the authors concluded that LADG could be an alternative surgical modality for treating AGC. However, we have some concerns about this because we think that the authors did not fulfill the points of discussion well enough to adequately demonstrate the feasibility of LADG for AGC.
机译:戈登等。 [1]检查了201例接受远端胃切除术以治疗晚期胃癌(AGC)的患者。这项研究的主要目的是评估接受腹腔镜胃切除术(LADG)的患者的短期和长期结果,并将这些结果与接受开腹手术(ODG)的患者进行比较。两组之间的总生存率或收集的淋巴结数目没有显着差异。 LADG组的短期结果更好,包括术后住院时间,术后并发症发生率和术中失血量。在此基础上,作者得出结论,LADG可能是治疗AGC的另一种手术方式。但是,我们对此有一些担忧,因为我们认为作者没有很好地满足讨论的要点,不足以充分证明LADG用于AGC的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号