首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Who should decide the best minimally invasive approach? Should we listen to our patients?
【24h】

Who should decide the best minimally invasive approach? Should we listen to our patients?

机译:谁应该决定最佳的微创方法?我们应该听病人的话吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with special interest the article entitled Patient Preferences for New Techniques: Should We Invest in New Approaches? by Rao et al. [1] published online 19 May 2010. This definitely well-designed article with an interesting methodology tried to question people about minimally invasive surgery considering their different educational backgrounds. Nevertheless, we cannot help disagreeing with some important points stated by Rao et al.An important issue stated in this paper is the assumption that single-port surgery involves the same principles as those currently recognized widely as foundational to "regular laparoscopic surgery." As we stated in previous communications, single-port procedures are not regular laparoscopic surgery and therefore should be performed only by experienced laparoscopic surgeons with specific training in the animal lab before they are applied to human cases.
机译:我们特别感兴趣地阅读了标题为“新技术的患者偏好:我们应该投资新方法”的文章。由Rao等人撰写。 [1]在线发表于2010年5月19日。这篇绝对精心设计的文章采用了一种有趣的方法,试图根据人们不同的教育背景向人们询问微创手术。但是,我们不能不同意Rao等人的观点。本文中提到的一个重要问题是,假设单端口手术所涉及的原理与目前公认的“常规腹腔镜手术”的原理相同。正如我们在之前的来文中所述,单端口手术不是常规的腹腔镜手术,因此,只有在经验丰富的腹腔镜手术医生在动物实验室中接受过专门培训之后,才能进行操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号