首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review.
【24h】

Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review.

机译:尼莫地平在局灶性脑缺血动物模型实验中的应用:系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Based on the results of animal experiments, clinical trials were performed with nimodipine, which did not demonstrate a beneficial effect on outcome after stroke. The aim of this study was to determine whether the evidence from animal experiments with nimodipine supported the use of nimodipine in clinical trials. METHODS:- We performed a systematic review of animal experiments with nimodipine in focal cerebral ischemia. Studies were identified by searching Medline and Embase. We assessed whether these studies showed a beneficial effect of active treatment. In-depth analyses were performed on infarct size and amount of edema, and subgroup analyses were performed on the length of the time window to the initiation of treatment and the methodological quality of the studies. RESULTS:- Of 225 identified articles, 20 studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies was poor. Of the included studies, 50% were in favor of nimodipine. In-depth analyses showed statistically significant effects in favor of treatment (10 studies). No influence of the length of time to the initiation of treatment or of the methodological quality on the results was found. CONCLUSIONS:- We conclude that the results of this review did not show convincing evidence to substantiate the decision to perform trials with nimodipine in large numbers of patients. There were no differences between the results of the animal experiments and clinical studies. Surprisingly, we found that animal experiments and clinical studies ran simultaneously.
机译:背景与目的:基于动物实验的结果,尼莫地平进行了临床试验,但未证明对中风后的结局具有有益作用。这项研究的目的是确定来自尼莫地平动物实验的证据是否支持尼莫地平在临床试验中的使用。方法:-我们对尼莫地平治疗局灶性脑缺血的动物实验进行了系统评价。通过搜索Medline和Embase鉴定研究。我们评估了这些研究是否显示出积极治疗的有益效果。对梗塞大小和水肿量进行了深入分析,并对开始治疗的时间窗长度和研究的方法学质量进行了亚组分析。结果:-在225篇确定的文章中,包括20项研究。研究的方法学质量差。在纳入的研究中,有50%赞成尼莫地平。深入的分析显示出统计学上显着的有利于治疗的效果(10项研究)。没有发现开始治疗的时间长度或方法质量对结果的影响。结论:-我们得出的结论是,该评价的结果并未显示令人信服的证据来证实对大量患者进行尼莫地平试验的决定。动物实验和临床研究的结果之间没有差异。令人惊讶的是,我们发现动物实验和临床研究同时进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号