首页> 外文期刊>Spectroscopy >Infrared Analysis for the Busy Crime Laboratory -- Getting the Most Out of Illicit Drug Analysis Using FT-IR and GC-MS
【24h】

Infrared Analysis for the Busy Crime Laboratory -- Getting the Most Out of Illicit Drug Analysis Using FT-IR and GC-MS

机译:繁忙犯罪实验室的红外分析-利用FT-IR和GC-MS充分利用非法药物分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

According to the Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs (SWGDRUG), techniques with the highest discriminating power should preferentially be used for forensic identification of seized drugs. Table I shows the analytical technique categories listed in order of decreasing discriminating power from A to C. SWGDRUG recommends at minimum that when a Category A technique is used, at least one other technique of any category must also be used. In practice, many drug labs choose GC-MS since this addresses the recommendation and they get credit for the two techniques -- MS (Category A) & GC (Category B). However, this recommendation is a minimum and many labs are finding that GC-MS is not always the best choice for the particular sample they are analyzing. Infrared spectroscopy can do things GC-MS can't, such as analyzing drugs in salt form and uniquely identifying certain stereoisomers. It is also an excellent rapid-screening tool. In fact, in most federal labs, infrared analysis is a requirement.
机译:根据缉毒分析科学工作组(SWGDRUG)的说法,应优先使用具有最高鉴别能力的技术进行法医鉴定。表I列出了按从A到C的区分能力递减的顺序列出的分析技术类别。SWGDRUG建议至少使用A类技术时,还必须至少使用任何其他任何一种技术。在实践中,许多药物实验室选择GC-MS,因为这满足了建议,他们对这两种技术(MS(类别A)和GC(类别B))表示赞赏。但是,此建议是最低要求,许多实验室发现GC-MS并非始终是所分析特定样品的最佳选择。红外光谱法可以完成GC-MS无法完成的工作,例如分析盐形式的药物并唯一地识别某些立体异构体。它也是一种出色的快速筛选工具。实际上,在大多数联邦实验室中,红外分析是必不可少的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Spectroscopy》 |2010年第2suppla期|共2页
  • 作者

    Mike Garry;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 15:13:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号