首页> 外文期刊>Ceramic Forum International >Comparative Study between Hand-Casted and 3D-Printed Brushite Bioceramic Scaffolds and Implants
【24h】

Comparative Study between Hand-Casted and 3D-Printed Brushite Bioceramic Scaffolds and Implants

机译:手工铸造和3D打印的透钙磷矿生物陶瓷支架和植入物的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Brushite is a versatile bone replacement material which is biocompatible as well as biodegradable enabling complete bone healing. According to the variety of different defect complexities, there are several manufacturing techniques for bone grafts. In this study the authors present a direct comparison of two manufacturing procedures for brushite bioceramics: hand-casting and 3D-Powder Printing (3DP). Due to different processing regimes, mechanical properties as well as phase composition were influenced. 3D-printed samples showed a higher mechanical performance compared to hand-casted cements, which was attributed to higher degree of cement conversion. A further reinforcement of such 3D-printed samples was achieved by polymer impregnation, which in turn enabled the insertion of bone screws for implant fixation at the application site.
机译:透钙磷石是一种通用的骨替代材料,具有生物相容性和可生物降解性,可实现完整的骨愈合。根据各种不同的缺陷复杂性,存在几种用于骨移植物的制造技术。在这项研究中,作者提出了两种透钙磷矿生物陶瓷制造工艺的直接比较:手工铸造和3D粉体印刷(3DP)。由于不同的处理方式,机械性能以及相组成受到影响。与手工浇铸的水泥相比,3D打印的样品显示出更高的机械性能,这归因于更高的水泥转化率。通过聚合物浸渍进一步增强了此类3D打印样品,从而可以插入骨螺钉以将植入物固定在应用部位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号