...
首页> 外文期刊>Cephalalgia >Triptan overuse in the Dutch general population: a nationwide pharmaco-epidemiology database analysis in 6.7 million people.
【24h】

Triptan overuse in the Dutch general population: a nationwide pharmaco-epidemiology database analysis in 6.7 million people.

机译:Triptan过度使用在荷兰的总人口中:全国670万人口的药物流行病学数据库分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: A population-based observational study was used to assess the prevalence, demographics, risk factors, and costs of triptan overuse, defined as more than 30 (International Headache Society criteria) or 54 (stringent criteria) defined daily doses per 3 months. METHODS: Analysis of the Dutch Health Care Insurance Board Database for 2005, which included prescriptions for 6.7 million people (46% of the total Dutch population). RESULTS: Triptans were used by 85,172 (1.3%) people; of these, 8,844 (10.4%; 95% CI 10.2-10.6) were overusers by International Headache Society and 2,787 (3.3%; 95% CI 3.2-3.4) were overusers by stringent criteria. The triptan-specific odds ratios for the rate of International Headache Society overuse compared with sumatriptan were: 0.26 (95% CI 0.19-0.36) for frovatriptan; 0.34 (95% CI 0.32-0.37) for rizatriptan; 0.76 95% CI 0.68-0.85) for naratriptan; 0.86 (95% CI 0.72-1.02) for eletriptan; 0.97 (95% CI 0.88-1.06) for zolmitriptan; and 1.49 (95% CI 1.31-1.72) for almotriptan. Costs for overuse were 29.7 million euros; for the International Headache Society criteria this was 46% of total costs and for stringent criteria it was 23%. DISCUSSION: In the Dutch general population, 1.3% used a triptan in 2005, of which 10.3% were overusers and accounted for half of the total costs of triptans. Users of frovatriptan, rizatriptan and naratriptan had a lower level of overuse.
机译:简介:基于人群的观察性研究用于评估曲坦滥用的发生率,人口统计学,危险因素和成本,曲坦定义为每3个月超过30(国际头痛学会标准)或54​​(严格标准)定义的每日剂量。方法:对2005年荷兰医疗保险委员会数据库的分析,其中包括670万人的处方药(占荷兰总人口的46%)。结果:曲普坦被85,172(1.3%)人使用;其中,按照严格的标准,国际头痛协会过度使用了8,844(10.4%; 95%CI 10.2-10.6),严格标准则过度使用了2,787(3.3%; 95%CI 3.2-3.4)。与舒马普坦相比,国际头痛协会过度使用率的曲普坦比优势比是:曲伐曲普坦为0.26(95%CI 0.19-0.36);利扎曲普坦0.34(95%CI 0.32-0.37);纳拉曲普坦0.76 95%CI 0.68-0.85);依曲普坦0.86(95%CI 0.72-1.02);佐米曲普坦0.97(95%CI 0.88-1.06);和阿莫曲坦的1.49(95%CI 1.31-1.72)。过度使用费用为2,970万欧元;对于国际头痛协会标准而言,这是总成本的46%,对于严格标准而言,则是23%。讨论:在荷兰的总人口中,2005年有1.3%的人使用曲普坦,其中10.3%是过度使用者,占曲普坦总成本的一半。氟伐曲坦,利扎曲普坦和那拉曲普坦的使用者滥用水平较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号