首页> 外文期刊>Cephalalgia >Comparing patient and parent recall of 90-day and 30-day migraine disability using elements of the PedMIDAS and an Internet headache diary.
【24h】

Comparing patient and parent recall of 90-day and 30-day migraine disability using elements of the PedMIDAS and an Internet headache diary.

机译:使用PedMIDAS和互联网头痛日记比较患者和父母对90天和30天偏头痛的回忆。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The optimal recall interval to assess migraine disability must balance recall accuracy with generalizability across a range of headache frequencies. When compared to daily diary entries, recall accuracy of PedMIDAS elements and headache frequency improves at 30 days compared to 90 days. Parent report of migraine disability should not be used as a replacement for patient report.
机译:评估偏头痛残疾的最佳召回间隔必须在一系列头痛频率范围内,在召回准确性和普遍性之间取得平衡。与每日日记条目相比,PedMIDAS元素的回忆准确性和头痛频率在30天时比90天时提高。父母偏头痛致残报告不应代替患者报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号