...
首页> 外文期刊>Southwestern Entomologist >Comparison of absolute estimates of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera : Thripidae) with field visual counting and sticky traps in onion field in south Texas
【24h】

Comparison of absolute estimates of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera : Thripidae) with field visual counting and sticky traps in onion field in south Texas

机译:德克萨斯州南部洋葱田​​中烟蓟马(Thysanoptera:Thripidae)的绝对估计值与野外目测计数和粘性陷阱的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Absolute estimates of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman, on onions were used to determine the reliability of field visual counting, and blue and white plastic cup traps and CC traps for monitoring thrips in onion fields. It took >140 min to sample one plant for the absolute estimates of thrips, which was approximate to15-fold longer than needed to sample one plant by field visual counting, and 3.8- and 4.3-fold longer than processing a sample using a plastic cup trap or a CC trap sample, respectively. Results indicated that adult thrips comprised approximate to16.4 and 15.8% of total thrips in the absolute estimates and field visual counting, respectively, and were well correlated with total thrips in each sampling method (r = 0.81 and 0.73, respectively). Total thrips and adults by field visual counting estimated approximate to75% of total thrips and approximate to78% of adults of the absolute estimates, and were highly correlated with the absolute estimates (r = 0.98 and 0.95, respectively). Blue plastic cup traps caught the most thrips (19-23 thrips/trap/day), followed by white plastic cup traps (10-12 thrips/trap/day), compared with <1 adult thrips/trap/day on CC traps. Adults caught on the sticky traps were not well correlated with numbers of thrips on onion plants in the field (r = 0.07-0.61). Field visual counting of either all thrips or only adults on onion plants was quick and provided >95% precision.
机译:洋葱蓟马的绝对估计值(Thrips tabaci Lindeman,洋葱)用于确定野外目测计数的可靠性,以及用于监视洋葱田间蓟马的蓝色和白色塑料杯陷阱和CC陷阱。对一株植物进行蓟马的绝对估计需要花费140分钟以上的时间,这比通过现场目测计数对一株植物进行采样所需的时间长约15倍,比使用塑料杯处理样品要长3.8倍和4.3倍捕集阱或CC捕集阱样品。结果表明,在绝对估计和现场目测计数中,成年蓟马分别占总蓟马的约16.4和15.8%,并且在每种采样方法中与蓟马的总数有很好的相关性(分别为r = 0.81和0.73)。通过现场目测计数得出的总蓟马和成虫总数约为绝对估计数的75%,约占成年人总数的78%,并且与绝对估计数高度相关(分别为r = 0.98和0.95)。蓝色塑料杯陷阱捕获的蓟马最多(19-23个蓟马/陷阱/天),其次是白色塑料杯陷阱(10-12个蓟马/陷阱/天),而CC陷阱的成人蓟马/陷阱每天少于1个。粘在诱捕器上的成虫与田间洋葱植株的蓟马数量没有很好的相关性(r = 0.07-0.61)。对洋葱植物上所有蓟马或仅成虫的野外目视计数很快,并且提供了> 95%的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号