首页> 外文期刊>Southern Medical Journal >Two Types of Prehospital Systems Interventions that Triage Low-Acuity Patients to Alternative Sites of Care
【24h】

Two Types of Prehospital Systems Interventions that Triage Low-Acuity Patients to Alternative Sites of Care

机译:两种类型的院前系统干预措施,可将低敏患者分流到其他护理场所

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives This study retrospectively compared alternatives for navigating low-acuity patients in two emergency medical services systems. System A involved a response to every 9-1-1 request with an evaluate, treat, and refer process, in which paramedics decided whether patients could be treated on-scene and referred to a primary care provider or urgent care center. System B used a telephone triage and referral process, in which callers of low severity were diverted from 9-1-1 to call centers where nurses provided advice and/or a referral to a primary care provider/urgent care center. We hypothesized that systems A and B would differ in terms of the percentage of patients following referral instructions and the percentage of patients who were satisfied with their care.
机译:目的本研究回顾性地比较了在两个紧急医疗服务系统中导航低视力患者的替代方法。系统A涉及对每个9-1-1请求的响应,包括评估,治疗和转诊过程,在该过程中,护理人员决定是否可以对患者进行现场治疗,然后转诊至初级保健提供者或紧急护理中心。系统B使用电话分流和转诊过程,其中低严重性的呼叫者从9-1-1转移到呼叫中心,护士在该呼叫中心提供建议和/或转诊给初级保健提供者/紧急护理中心。我们假设系统A和B在遵循转诊说明的患者百分比和对自己的护理满意的患者百分比方面会有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号