首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Counterpoint: physician-industry relationships can be ethically established, and conflicts of interest can be ethically managed.
【24h】

Counterpoint: physician-industry relationships can be ethically established, and conflicts of interest can be ethically managed.

机译:对立面:可以从道德上建立医师与行业的关系,并且可以从道德上解决利益冲突。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Review of the nature of conflicts of interest in physician-industry relationships, with a focus on the efforts to ethically manage physician-industry relationships. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the perspective that physician-industry relationships can be ethically established, and conflicts of interest can be ethically managed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The interest in considering the appropriateness of physician-industry relationships has recently become focused on spine surgery. Many of the conflicts of interest inherent to these relationships have been interpreted as problematic, and have been scrutinized by the media, industry, medical and legal professions, and Federal government. METHODS: The basis for conflicts of interest, manner in which bias may be introduced, and methods to reduce bias are presented. The potential risks and benefits to patients that are inherent to physician-industry relationships are considered. A framework, developed by medical ethicists, is provided to guide analysis of conflicts of interest in physician-industry relationships. RESULTS: Collaboration between spine surgeons and industry is necessary to improve patient care. The conflicts of interest that often arise in physician-industry relationships must be recognized, and keenly managed in order to eliminate the risk and maximize the benefit to the patient. Ethical management of conflicts must include disclosure. To preserve patient autonomy, management should also include a discussion of the quality of the medical evidence on which treatment recommendations are made. Guidelines from industry and medical professional organizations, including the "Standards of Professionalism" currently under development by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery, are also expected to aid in the ethical establishment and management of conflicts of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration of conflicts of interest in physician-industry relationships has provided an opportunity to review our goals as physicians in society, and to continue collaborative advancement of our field for the benefit of our patients.
机译:研究设计:审查医师与行业关系中的利益冲突的性质,重点是从道德上管理医师与行业关系的工作。目的:说明可以从伦理上建立医患关系,从伦理上管理利益冲突的观点。背景数据概述:最近,人们对考虑医患关系的兴趣已经集中在脊柱外科手术上。这些关系固有的许多利益冲突被认为是有问题的,并已受到媒体,行业,医疗和法律专业以及联邦政府的审查。方法:介绍了利益冲突的基础,可能引入偏见的方式以及减少偏见的方法。考虑医患关系固有的对患者的潜在风险和收益。提供了由医学伦理学家开发的框架,以指导对医患关系中的利益冲突进行分析。结果:脊柱外科医生与业界之间的合作对于改善患者护理至关重要。为了消除风险并使患者受益最大化,必须认识并敏锐地解决医师与企业之间经常发生的利益冲突。冲突的道德管理必须包括披露。为了保持患者的自主权,管理人员还应该对提出治疗建议的医学证据的质量进行讨论。业界和医学专业组织的指导方针,包括美国骨外科学院目前正在制定的“专业标准”,也有望有助于道德上建立和管理利益冲突。结论:认真考虑医师与行业关系中的利益冲突,为我们回顾社会上作为医师的目标提供了机会,并为我们的患者的利益继续我们领域的协同发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号