首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.
【24h】

Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.

机译:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的冠状和矢状面矫正:所有椎弓根螺钉与混合胸椎钩状腰椎螺钉结构之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using a previously matched convenience sample of 34 patients. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the relative corrective benefits of these 2 types of constructs in the correction of coronal and sagittal curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In addition, the 2 constructs were compared for coronal and sagittal balance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Recent clinical research suggests that thoracic pedicle screw constructs (all-screw constructs) are more effective than hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook constructs (hybrid constructs) in correcting spine deformity. METHODS: The sample consisted of patients with AIS who underwent isolated posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Seventeen patients underwent fusion using all-screw constructs, and 17 underwent fusion with hybrid constructs; preoperative and postoperative radiographs and measurements were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference observed when comparing the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group (P = 0.089). In the all-screw group, mean thoracic kyphosis decreased from 29.6 degrees to 19.4 degrees (P = 0.012). Sagittal balance changed in the hybrid group from -21.2 mm to 8.2 mm, and in the all-screw group changed from -28.8 mm to 1.5 mm. The major curve in the hybrid group improved from 54.06 degrees to 20.25 degrees and improved from 54.88 degrees to 15.06 degrees in the all-screw group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference comparing the 2 groups, although a trend was observed toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group. The all-screw group demonstrated a significant decrease in kyphosis, which was not seen in the hybrid group. Hybrid constructs were comparable to all-screw constructs in the correction of coronal plane deformity and sagittal balance.
机译:研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了先前匹配的34位患者的便利性样本。目的:本研究旨在确定这两种类型的结构在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者冠状和矢状曲线矫正中的相对矫正益处。另外,比较了两种构建体的冠状和矢状平衡。背景信息摘要:最近的临床研究表明,胸椎椎弓根螺钉结构(全螺钉结构)在矫正脊柱畸形方面比混合腰椎螺钉胸钩结构(混合结构)更有效。方法:该样本由AIS患者组成,他们接受了孤立的后路脊柱融合和器械治疗。 17例患者采用全螺钉构建体融合,17例患者与混合构建体融合。比较术前和术后X线片和测量值。结果:比较两组时,没有观察到显着差异,尽管在全螺钉构造组中,主胸曲线有更好的校正趋势(P = 0.089)。在全螺钉组中,平均胸椎后凸畸形从29.6度降低到19.4度(P = 0.012)。混合组的矢状平衡从-21.2 mm变为8.2 mm,而全螺纹组从-28.8 mm变为1.5 mm。混合动力组中的主要曲线从54.06度改善到20.25度,而全螺钉组的主要曲线从54.88度改善到15.06度。结论:尽管观察到全螺钉构建组的主胸曲线有更好的矫正趋势,但两组相比在统计学上没有显着差异。全螺钉组显示出驼背明显减少,这在杂交组中未见。在冠状面畸形和矢状面平衡的矫正中,混合结构与全螺钉结构相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号