...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: Effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains
【24h】

Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: Effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains

机译:long骨后路固定结构中骨螺钉应变和运动范围的生物力学分析:腰s骨固定策略在减少骨螺钉应变中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design.: A cadaveric biomechanical experiment was conducted to assess the range of motion (ROM) and screw strain at S1 in a long instrumented spinal fusion construct to compare the effects of various surgical strategies for L5-S1 stabilization. Objective.: To directly quantify and compare S1 screw strains and lumbosacral ROM for 4 different L2-S1 posterior segmental instrumented fusion constructs: an L2-S1 pedicle screw (PS) construct alone and PS with each of 3 different augmentations, anterior lumbar intebody fusion (ALIF), anterior axial interbody threaded rod (AxiaLITR), or iliac screws. Summary of Background Data.: Iliac screws and anterior interbody devices are commonly used as augmentation to reduce the incidence of S1 screw loosening in long fusion constructs. Alternatives, such as AxiaLITR, may provide similar biomechanical advantages without many of the same long-term limitations and morbidities. Methods.: Pure moment flexibility testing was performed in 6 cadaveric lumbosacral spines. Specimens were tested with 4 instrumentation constructs: (.1) PS L2-S1, (2) PS with ALIF, (3) PS with AxiaLITR, and (4) PS with iliac screws. Bilateral S1 PS were instrumented with strain gauges, directly measuring screw loading while simultaneously measuring L5-S1 ROM with a noncontact camera system. Results.: Average S1 screw strains were the greatest with the PS group and were reduced by 38% with the ALIF group, 75% with the AxiaLITR group, and 78% with the iliac screw group in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in torsion (P < 0.05). Strains in lateral bending were smaller in magnitude and were similar among all 4 constructs. The AxiaLITR and iliac screw groups demonstrated a similar ROM and significant reduction in ROM at L5-S1 compared with both the PS and ALIF groups (P ≤ 0.02 and P < 0.03). Conclusion.: The Results of this study indicated that iliac screws and AxiaLITR provide similar stability at L5-S1, while significantly reducing the strain on the S1 screws.
机译:研究设计:进行了尸体生物力学实验,以评估长器械脊柱融合结构中S1的运动范围(ROM)和螺丝应变,以比较各种手术策略对L5-S1稳定化的效果。目的:直接量化和比较4种不同的L2-S1后段节段器械融合结构的S1螺钉应变和腰s部ROM:单独的L2-S1椎弓根螺钉(PS)结构和3种不同增强方式的PS,分别是前腰椎体融合(ALIF),前轴向椎间螺纹杆(AxiaLITR)或骨螺钉。背景数据摘要:lia骨螺钉和前体椎间融合器通常用作增强,以减少长融合结构中S1螺钉松动的发生率。诸如AxiaLITR之类的替代产品可能会提供类似的生物力学优势,而不会带来许多相同的长期局限性和发病率。方法:在6个尸体腰s棘中进行纯力矩柔韧性测试。用4种仪器构造测试了标本:(。1)PS L2-S1,(2)PS带ALIF,(3)PS带AxiaLITR,以及(4)PS带ilia骨螺钉。双边S1 PS装有应变片,可直接测量螺钉负载,同时使用非接触式摄像头系统测量L5-S1 ROM。结果:PS组的平均S1螺钉应变最大,而屈曲伸直的AL1组降低了38%,AxiaLITR组降低了75%,the骨螺钉组降低了78%(P <0.05)。在扭转中观察到类似趋势(P <0.05)。横向弯曲的应变幅度较小,并且在所有4种结构中相似。与PS和ALIF组相比,AxiaLITR和骨螺钉组显示出相似的ROM,并且L5-S1处的ROM显着减少(P≤0.02和P <0.03)。结论:这项研究的结果表明骨螺钉和AxiaLITR在L5-S1处提供相似的稳定性,同时显着降低了S1螺钉上的应变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号