首页> 外文期刊>Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research >Saline reclaimed wastewater can be used to produce potted weeping fig (Ficus benjamina L.) with minimal effects on plant quality.
【24h】

Saline reclaimed wastewater can be used to produce potted weeping fig (Ficus benjamina L.) with minimal effects on plant quality.

机译:盐水回收废水可用于生产盆栽垂枝无花果(Ficus benjamina L.),对植物质量的影响最小。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of the present study was to investigate the limitations of irrigation with saline reclaimed wastewater (RW) for producing potted weeping fig (Ficus benjamina L.). Furthermore, two different levels of leaching were studied to ascertain whether either reduces the negative effects of RW. Three irrigation treatments were applied: (a) well water (control), (b) RW (5 dS m-1) with a constant leaching fraction of 23% (RWL), and (c) RW (5 dS m-1) with a constant leaching fraction of 15% and 50% flushing every nine irrigation events (RWF). After five months of exposure to the RW, plant size, leaf area, specific leaf area, plant DW, stem diameter and shoot/root ratio were reduced, but both compactness and the appearance of the plants remained high. RWF reduced leaf area, plant dry weight, stem diameter, leaf lightness, leaf chroma and leaf SPAD compared with the RWL. Water consumption per pot was higher in control (50.58 L), followed by RWL (24.29 L) and RWF (19.6 L). Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance were 50% lower in RWL plants than in the control, while the RWF plants had the lowest rates. RWF caused damages in the photochemical apparatus. This study confirms that: (a) weeping fig is a good candidate for being grown with saline RW without compromising its aesthetic value; (b) RW may be regarded as a good alternative to the retardants used in this plant; and (c) the recommended irrigation would be RWL.
机译:本研究的目的是调查用盐水再生废水(RW)灌溉生产盆栽无花果(Ficus benjamina L.)的局限性。此外,研究了两种不同的浸出水平,以确定是否降低了RW的负面影响。进行了三种灌溉处理:(a)井水(对照),(b)RW(5 dS m -1 ),浸出率恒定为23%(RWL),(c)RW (5 dS m -1 ),每九次灌溉事件(RWF)的浸出常数恒定为15%和50%。在暴露于RW的五个月后,植物的大小,叶面积,比叶面积,植物DW,茎直径和枝/根比降低,但植物的紧实度和外观仍然很高。与RWL相比,RWF减少了叶片面积,植物干重,茎直径,叶片明度,叶片色度和叶片SPAD。对照的每盆水消耗量更高(50.58 L),其次是RWL(24.29 L)和RWF(19.6 L)。 RWL植物的光合作用和气孔导度比对照低50%,而RWF植物的光合作用和气孔导度最低。 RWF造成了光化学设备的损坏。这项研究证实:(a)哭泣的无花果是在不损害其美观价值的前提下,用盐水RW种植的理想选择; (b)RW可被视为替代该工厂中使用的阻燃剂的好选择; (c)建议的灌溉方式为RWL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号