...
首页> 外文期刊>Sociobiology >Efficacy of Commercial Termite Baiting Systems for Management of Subterranean Termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Texas
【24h】

Efficacy of Commercial Termite Baiting Systems for Management of Subterranean Termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Texas

机译:商业白蚁诱饵系统在德克萨斯州地下白蚁(等翅目:犀牛科)管理中的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The success of commercial baiting strategies for remedial control of subterranean termites has historically had mixed results, owing to discrepancies in applicator error, pest pressure, and choice of toxicant. For this reason, an independent assessment of two specific active ingredients, and three dispensing mechanisms was evaluated to determine their overall efficacy for remedial control of subterranean termite activity in Texas. FirstLine (FMC Corp.), Sentriconwith Recruit IPbait (Dow AgroSciences), and Terminate (United Industries, Inc) systems were evaluated. The time required for foraging termites to locate and initiate feeding on Sentricon and Terminate bait stations was approximately one-half the time required to locate and begin feeding on FirstLine, for both Reticulitermesflavipes and Coptotermesformosanus. The time required for C.formosanus to locate and initiate feeding on all termite baiting systems was approximately one-half the time required for R.flavipes. Significant differences inefficacy between the three baitingtreatment systems for R.flavipes were not observed, with a mean efficacy of 84%. Sentricon8 achieved efficacy (88%) results with supplemental liquid termiticide treatments. FirstLine efficacy (80%) and Terminate efficacy(84%) results required initial and subsequent spot-treatments with liquid termiticides for comparable results. Sentricon yielded better results in the management of C.formosanus, if augmented with supplementary in-ground and above-ground bait stations.Optimum results were achieved when monitoring of bait stations occurred twice each month, rather than on a monthly monitoring regime.
机译:历史上,由于施用错误,害虫压力和毒物选择方面的差异,成功地控制地下白蚁的商业诱饵策略取得了成功。因此,对两种特定的活性成分进行了独立评估,并对三种分配机制进行了评估,以确定它们对德克萨斯州地下白蚁活动的补救控制的总体功效。对FirstLine(FMC Corp。),Sentriconwith Recruit IPbait(Dow AgroSciences)和Terminate(United Industries,Inc)系统进行了评估。对于网纹白蚁和拟白蚁,觅食白蚁在Sentricon和Terminate诱饵站上觅食并开始觅食所需的时间约为在FirstLine上觅食并开始觅食所需时间的一半。福寿螺在所有白蚁诱饵系统上定位并开始觅食所需的时间大约是黄褐藻所需时间的一半。没有观察到三种诱饵处理系统对黄酮的显着差异,平均效率为84%。 Sentricon8通过补充液体杀白蚁剂治疗达到功效(88%)的结果。为了获得可比的结果,FirstLine功效(80%)和Terminate功效(84%)的结果需要使用液体杀白蚁剂进行初始和后续斑点处理。如果增加辅助的地面和地上诱饵站,Sentricon可以在福寿螺的管理中取得更好的结果。当每月对诱饵站进行两次监测而不是每月进行一次监测时,可以获得最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号