...
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >The Legitimacy of Bamboo Certification: Unpacking the Controversy and the Implications for a 'Treelike' Grass
【24h】

The Legitimacy of Bamboo Certification: Unpacking the Controversy and the Implications for a 'Treelike' Grass

机译:竹认证的合法性:展开争议和对“树状”草的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bamboo is emerging as an important substitute for wood and wood fiber. Although bamboo can be assimilated within existing forest certification mechanisms, there is growing controversy among experts regarding the applicability and efficacy of adopting such instruments. Through an accumulation of fieldwork, interviews, and discussions among experts between 2005 and 2014, this article analyzes the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification, as well as proposals arising within the bamboo community. Through the lens of legitimacy, it analyzes stakeholders' views of the input legitimacy (processes) and output legitimacy (effectiveness) of FSC bamboo certification. It highlights the dissatisfaction with the third-party model for smallholders, as well the lack of ecological management gains within the FSC system. However, currently the bamboo communities of practice are divided about ways to proceed regarding creating alternative approaches. At a macro level, it highlights current challenges regarding the need to facilitate new resources into already existing institutions.
机译:竹子正在成为木材和木纤维的重要替代品。尽管可以在现有的森林认证机制中吸收竹子,但专家们对于采用这种工具的适用性和有效性的争议越来越大。通过在2005年至2014年之间进行的大量野外工作,访谈和讨论,本文分析了森林管理委员会(FSC)的认证以及竹林社区中提出的建议。通过合法性的角度,它分析了利益相关者对FSC竹认证的输入合法性(过程)和输出合法性(有效性)的看法。它强调了对小农户的第三方模式的不满,以及FSC系统内缺乏生态管理收益。但是,当前竹子实践社区在创建替代方法方面的方法上存在分歧。从宏观上讲,它着重说明了在将新资源提供给现有机构方面的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号