首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >An Analysis of the 'Path of Least Resistance' Argument in Three Environmental Justice Success Cases
【24h】

An Analysis of the 'Path of Least Resistance' Argument in Three Environmental Justice Success Cases

机译:三起环境司法成功案例中的“抗拒路径”论证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research suggests that environmental hazards tend to be disproportionately sited in poor and minority neighborhoods. Recent findings indicate that the greatest environmental inequalities may have been related to the 1970s "not in my backyard" movementand the "path of least resistance." The purpose of this research is to expand upon the "path of least resistance" perspective by looking at three environmental justice success cases. In each case community-based environmental justice groups were able tostop the siting of an industrial facility. We find that in one case the company never again attempted to build the facility and waste materials were sent to an alternative location. In the other two cases the companies were able to construct similar facilities in different communities. While the demographic characteristics of the failed and successful sitings were similar, there is still some evidence that industry production practices change as a result of these environmental justice social movements.
机译:研究表明,环境贫困往往分布在贫困和少数民族社区。最近的发现表明,最大的环境不平等可能与1970年代的“不在我家后院”运动和“阻力最小的道路”有关。这项研究的目的是通过研究三个环境正义成功案例来扩展“最小抵抗路径”的观点。在每种情况下,基于社区的环境司法团体都能够停止对工业设施的选址。我们发现,在一种情况下,公司再也没有尝试过建造工厂,而废料则被送到了另一个地点。在其他两种情况下,公司能够在不同的社区中建设类似的设施。尽管失败和成功选民的人口特征相似,但仍有一些证据表明,由于这些环境正义的社会运动,工业生产实践发生了变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号