...
首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Agricultural Extension >The evaluation of the subtropical crops extension and advisory service (Subtrop) as perceived by farmer members in the subtropical regions, South Africa.
【24h】

The evaluation of the subtropical crops extension and advisory service (Subtrop) as perceived by farmer members in the subtropical regions, South Africa.

机译:南非亚热带地区的农民成员对亚热带作物延伸和咨询服务(Subtrop)的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In order to minimize duplication, consolidate resources and strengthen industry representation to government, the South African Avocado Growers Association (SAAGA), South African Litchi Growers Association (SALGA), South African Macadamia Growers Association (SAMAC) and the South African Mango Growers Association (SAMGA); amalgamated under an umbrella organization called Subtrop. This paper focuses on the effect the amalgamation had on Extension services to the abovementioned organizations. The effect was measured by conducting a survey which measured Subtrop member responses. The survey used a structured questionnaire which was completed individually at group interview sessions. Farmer and opinion leader respondents provided their perceptions and rated the extension services of the Technical Department of Subtrop. Respondents indicated that the study group as well as individual advice on farm practises as their preferred approach of the Extension service of Subtrop. A total of 54% of the respondents rated advice on farm practises as very important while 69% rated the study groups as very important. The efficiency of study groups were all rated higher after the amalgamation. More farmer respondents (64%) than opinion leaders (42%) indicated that they do not use the Subtrop website. Based on the findings it is recommended that Subtrop and its stakeholders need to develop an extension policy and strategy to ensure the deliverance of a service of excellence to its members.
机译:为了最大程度地减少重复,巩固资源并增强行业对政府的代表性,南非鳄梨种植者协会(SAAGA),南非荔枝种植者协会(SALGA),南非马卡达姆坚果种植者协会(SAMAC)和南非芒果种植者协会( SAMGA);合并为一个名为Subtrop的伞形组织。本文重点讨论合并对上述组织的推广服务的影响。通过进行测量Subtrop成员响应的调查来测量效果。该调查使用了结构化的调查问卷,该调查问卷是在小组访谈中单独完成的。农民和意见领袖的回答者提供了他们的看法,并对Subtrop技术部门的推广服务进行了评级。受访者表示,研究小组以及有关农场实践的个人建议是他们首选的Subtrop推广服务方法。共有54%的受访者将有关农场操作的建议评为非常重要,而69%的受访者将研究组视为非常重要。合并后,研究组的效率均被评为较高。表示不使用Subtrop网站的农民受访者(64%)比意见领袖(42%)多。根据调查结果,建议Subtrop及其利益相关者需要制定扩展政策和策略,以确保向其成员提供卓越的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号