首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Consensus Building or Constructive Conflict? Aboriginal Discursive Strategies to Enhance Participation in Natural Resource Management in Australia and Canada
【24h】

Consensus Building or Constructive Conflict? Aboriginal Discursive Strategies to Enhance Participation in Natural Resource Management in Australia and Canada

机译:建立共识还是建设性冲突?加强澳大利亚和加拿大自然资源管理参与度的土著话语策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article analyzes the strategies used by the Girringun Aboriginal Corporation from the Wet Tropics, Australia, and the Innu Nation of Labrador, Canada, in their efforts to participate in natural resource management within their traditional lands. Comparative research highlights that both Aboriginal groups engage in strategies of consensus building and constructive conflict, matching their choice to the dynamic institutional settings that govern natural resource management in their respective territories. Both groups build consensus for more equitable participation in natural resource management institutions while engaging, when necessary, in forms of constructive conflict that will bring about more expedient institutional change needed to fully reflect the full suite of Aboriginal interests and values. The result is a mix of Aboriginal strategies that are used to instigate planning reforms on their traditional estates.
机译:本文分析了澳大利亚湿热带地区的Girringun原住民公司和加拿大拉布拉多的Innu Nation在其传统土地上参与自然资源管理方面所采用的策略。比较研究表明,两个原住民群体都参与建立共识和建设性冲突的策略,使他们的选择与管理各自领土内自然资源管理的动态机构环境相匹配。两组都为更公平地参与自然资源管理机构建立了共识,同时在必要时参与了建设性冲突的形式,这些冲突将带来更充分体现原住民利益和价值观所需的更有利的机构变革。结果是混合了原住民策略,这些策略被用于对传统庄园进行规划改革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号