...
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Whose norms prevail? Policy networks, international organizations and 'sustainable forest management'.
【24h】

Whose norms prevail? Policy networks, international organizations and 'sustainable forest management'.

机译:谁的规范盛行?政策网络,国际组织和“可持续森林管理”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article investigates the origin of international norms, arguing that one pathway is via the strategic action of sector-specific policy networks. Evidence is adduced from an examination of the contested norm of sustainable forest management (SFM). It is argued that a Canadian forestry policy network, under pressure internally and externally to demonstrate its environmental and social credentials, promoted an "economistic" SFM norm in regional negotiations known as the Montreal Process. The article outlines the policy network approach, applies it to the Canadian forest sector, and analyzes how a policy network centered in the Canadian Forest Service and the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers worked to have the network's preferred conception of SFM internationally endorsed. The article highlights the importance of investigating which social actors champion which international norms and encourages reflexive policymaking by calling into question the degree to which international norms actually reflect a genuine global consensus.
机译:本文探讨了国际规范的起源,认为一条途径是通过针对特定部门的政策网络的战略行动。证据来自对有争议的可持续森林管理(SFM)规范的审查。有人认为,加拿大林业政策网络在内部和外部承受压力,以证明其在环境和社会上的信誉,从而在被称为“蒙特利尔进程”的区域谈判中推广了“经济”的可持续森林管理规范。本文概述了政策网络方法,将其应用于加拿大森林部门,并分析了以加拿大森林服务局和加拿大森林部长理事会为中心的政策网络如何努力使该网络的SFM首选概念得到国际认可。本文通过质疑国际规范实际上在多大程度上反映了真正的全球共识,强调了调查哪个社会行为者支持哪种国际规范并鼓励反思性决策的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号