首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Imagining resource management institutions—new creeks and old paddles: comments from the opening session of the 8th international symposium on society and resource management
【24h】

Imagining resource management institutions—new creeks and old paddles: comments from the opening session of the 8th international symposium on society and resource management

机译:影像资源管理机构—新小溪和旧桨:第八届社会与资源管理国际研讨会开幕式上的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay uses vignettes of six resource management organizations to explore institutional change in land conservation organizations. The emergence of the Progressive Era model of rational, centralized government is portrayed here both as reflective of the imperialist urgings of the early 1900s, and as less hegemonic than typically presented. Federal organizations such as the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management are clearly responsive to durable emphases on local control. More recently evolved, avowedly private, local organizations are, moreover, less clearly local and private than they first appear. The presently evolving institutional frame seems more complex than the one now eroding, and will require no less vigilance. And,even as we fail to note adequately the imperialism inherent in the Progressive-Era institutions we have taken for granted for so long, we ought to consider the underwriting assumptions and implications for equity in emerging institutional arrangements.
机译:本文使用六个资源管理组织的短片来探讨土地保护组织的制度变迁。在这里,理性的,集权的政府的“进步时代”模型的出现既反映了1900年代初期的帝国主义敦促,又没有通常所表现的霸权主义。诸如国家公园管理局和土地管理局的联邦组织显然对当地控制的持久重视做出了反应。此外,最近发展起来的,据称是私有的本地组织还不如它们最初出现时的本地和私有组织清晰。当前不断发展的体制框架似乎比现在正在侵蚀的体制更加复杂,并且需要更多的警惕。而且,即使我们没有充分注意到已经被视为理所当然的进步时代制度所固有的帝国主义,我们也应该考虑承保假设及其对新兴制度安排中公平的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号