...
首页> 外文期刊>Skin research and technology: official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) >Physical measurement and evaluation of skin color changes under normal condition and post-ultraviolet radiation: a comparison study of Chromameter CM 2500d and Maxmeter MX18
【24h】

Physical measurement and evaluation of skin color changes under normal condition and post-ultraviolet radiation: a comparison study of Chromameter CM 2500d and Maxmeter MX18

机译:正常条件下和紫外线照射后皮肤颜色变化的物理测量和评估:色度计CM 2500d和Maxmeter MX18的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the data correlation between two kinds of instruments, Chromameter CM2500d and Max-meter MX18, in the measurement of skin color changes under normal condition and post-ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Method: The data points of Chromameter CM2500d are based on L*a* values, while Maxmeter MX18 are based on M and E values, in order to compare the data correlation between these two kinds of instruments in skin color measurement on both non-exposed and exposed sites. In addition, an evaluation of the correlation of post-UV irradiation between these two instruments was conducted. Four different kinds of parameters post-UV radiation were measured including minimal erythema dose (MED), immediate pigmentation dose (IPD), minimal persistent pigmentation dose (MPPD) and repeated UV radiation. The following UV radiation dosages were applied as Day 1 =1.0 MED, Day 2 = 0.5 MED and Day 3 = 0.5 MED for repeated UV radiation, of which the erythema and pigmentation changes were recorded. Result: Chromameter CM2500d and Maxmeter MX18 showed good data correlation when measuring both non-exposed and exposed sites on normal skin. L* values were affected more easily by UV-induced erythema than M values on skin color changes after 1 MED and repeated UV exposures. IPD, MPPD and the pigmentation data showed good correlations with the measurement of the intensive erythema formation induced by repeated UV exposures, a* value was shown to be equally effective as E value with skin erythema measurements in response to various MEDs. However, increased erythema induced by repeated UV radiations was able to reduce the correlations between a* and Evalues. On the other hand, a* and E were shown to be equally effective in recording the erythema change courses after strong erythema responses post-UV radiations. Conclusion: This comparative study showed that the data correlations between the two kinds of instruments were different depending on measurement conditions. Both Chromameter...
机译:目的:比较色度计CM2500d和Max-meter MX18这两种仪器在正常条件下和紫外线(UV)照射下皮肤颜色变化的测量中的数据相关性。方法:色度计CM2500d的数据点基于L * a *值,而色度计MX18的数据点基于M和E值,以便比较这两种仪器在未曝光的皮肤颜色测量中的数据相关性和裸露的网站。另外,对这两种仪器之间的紫外线照射后的相关性进行了评估。测量了紫外线辐射后的四种不同类型的参数,包括最小红斑剂量(MED),立即色素沉着剂量(IPD),最小持续色素沉着剂量(MPPD)和重复紫外线辐射。对于重复的紫外线辐射,以下紫外线辐射剂量分别作为第1天= 1.0 MED,第2天= 0.5 MED和第3 = 0.5 MED记录,其中记录了红斑和色素沉着变化。结果:色度计CM2500d和Maxmeter MX18在测量正常皮肤的未暴露部位和暴露部位时显示出良好的数据相关性。 1次MED和反复紫外线照射后,紫外线引起的红斑的L *值比皮肤颜色变化的M值更容易受到影响。 IPD,MPPD和色素沉着数据与重复紫外线照射引起的强烈红斑形成的测量值具有良好的相关性,a *值与皮肤红斑测量值对E值的等效性与E值同样有效。然而,重复的紫外线辐射引起的红斑增加能够减少a *和Evalues之间的相关性。另一方面,显示a *和E在记录紫外线辐射后强烈的红斑反应后,在记录红斑变化过程方面同样有效。结论:这项比较研究表明,两种仪器之间的数据相关性因测量条件而异。两种色度计...

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号