...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil and Water Research >On-Farm Evaluation of Low-Pressure Drip IrrigationSystem for Smallholders
【24h】

On-Farm Evaluation of Low-Pressure Drip IrrigationSystem for Smallholders

机译:小农户低压滴灌系统的现场评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the performance of a low-pressure drip system (LPS) for three years of service, to calculate the consumptive working time and costs of maintenance and laterals retrieving before harvesting and to determine benefits and problems with drip irrigation. Drip irrigation provides the opportunity to save water and the potential to increase net income by applying water at the right quantity and at the right time. Small to medium fields would benefit from the LPS irrigation system which has the ability to distribute the amount of water applied. LPS is a well-researched system for drip irrigation, typically that available for furrow irrigated crops. There are significant agronomic advantages of using a low-pressure, low-flow drip system. These advantages translate into measured improved distribution uniformity when compared to flood irrigated crops and energy savings compared to flood and sprinkler irrigated crops. The old (reused) drip line leads to a decrease in distribution uniformity and an increase in costs, when the distribution uniformity decreased by 10.5 and 21.6% for reusing the laterals in the second and third year, respectively. Moreover, the cost of repairing laterals was more than 5 and 6.5 times higher for both the 2nd and 3rd season. Many disadvantages of drip lines retrieval can be observed, because labour and maintenance are more intensive; there is a risk of mechanical damage to laterals especially if they are reused; increased management skills andexperience are needed; and increased retrieval costs arise season after season.
机译:本文的目的是评估低压滴灌系统(LPS)连续使用三年的性能,计算消耗的工作时间,维护成本以及收割前进行侧向取水的成本,并确定滴灌的利弊。滴灌为您提供了节水的机会,并有可能通过在适当的时间和正确的时间用水来增加净收入。中小型农田将受益于LPS灌溉系统,该系统能够分配所施用的水量。 LPS是一种经过充分研究的滴灌系统,通常适用于犁沟灌溉的农作物。使用低压,低流量滴灌系统具有明显的农艺优势。与洪水灌溉的农作物相比,这些优势转化为可测量的,改善了的分配均匀性,与洪水灌溉和喷水灌溉的农作物相比,节约了能源。旧的(重复使用的)滴水线导致分配均匀性下降,成本增加,当在第二年和第三年重复使用支管时,分配均匀性分别下降了10.5和21.6%。此外,在第二季和第三季,修复支管的成本分别高出5倍和6.5倍。可以观察到滴水管取水的许多缺点,因为人工和维护更加密集。特别是如果重复使用支管,则存在对支管造成机械损坏的风险;需要提高管理技能和经验;并增加了检索成本的季节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号