...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Evaluating model-based relationship of cone index, soil water content and bulk density using dual-sensor penetrometer data.
【24h】

Evaluating model-based relationship of cone index, soil water content and bulk density using dual-sensor penetrometer data.

机译:使用双传感器渗透仪数据评估基于模型的锥度指数,土壤含水量和容重的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relationship among cone index (CI), soil water content ( theta ) and bulk density (Db) plays a critical role in assessing soil physical conditions. To predict Db as functions of the measurements of CI and theta , a variety of semi-empirical CI-models have been established historically, however a study for validating these models has not been found. In this study four CI-models, one considered the penetration depth as variable but others did not, were evaluated under laboratory condition. The methodology was to use our own developed dual-sensor vertical penetrometer (DSVP) to simultaneously measure CI and volumetric soil water content ( theta v), and then to compare the bulk density (Db) core-measured to that model-predicted by the DSVP data. Two types of soil samples (silt-loam and clay) were tested. Because a previous study speculated that penetration depth could confound the CI measured, two depth-dependent factors were incorporated into each CI-model for validating this speculation. Our study found that two of the four models tested fit the experimental data with acceptable R2 (>0.70) and RMSE (<0.093 g cm-3). In contrast, the experimental results confirmed that CI in Model-1 had a peak value adapting a wide range of theta . More ever, the results indicated that the DSVP combined with Model-1 or Model-2 can be used as a tool to predict Db when CI and theta are simultaneously measured.
机译:锥指数(CI),土壤含水量(theta)和堆积密度(D b )之间的关系在评估土壤物理条件方面起着至关重要的作用。为了预测D b 作为CI和θ测量值的函数,历史上已经建立了各种半经验CI模型,但是尚未找到验证这些模型的研究。在这项研究中,在实验室条件下评估了四个CI模型,其中一个认为渗透深度是变量,而其他则没有。该方法是使用我们自己开发的双传感器垂直渗透仪(DSVP)来同时测量CI和土壤水分含量(theta v ),然后比较堆密度(D b )对DSVP数据预测的模型进行了核心测量。测试了两种类型的土壤样品(粉壤土和粘土)。由于先前的研究推测穿透深度可能会混淆所测量的CI,因此将两个与深度有关的因素纳入每个CI模型中以验证这一推测。我们的研究发现,所测试的四个模型中的两个拟合了可接受的R 2 (> 0.70)和RMSE(<0.093 g cm -3 )的实验数据。相反,实验结果证实了Model-1中的CI具有可适应宽范围theta的峰值。而且,结果表明,当同时测量CI和theta时,结合模型1或模型2的DSVP可以用作预测D b 的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号