首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development.
【24h】

Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development.

机译:家人,朋友还是敌人?对社会资本在健康促进和社区发展中的相关性和作用的批判性思考。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social capital has been the focus of considerable academic and policy interest in recent years. Despite this interest, the concept remains undertheorized: there is an urgent need for a critical engagement with this literature that goes beyond summary. This paper lays a foundation for a critical dialogue between social capital and health promotion, by examining problematics in the conceptualization and practice of social capital building and linking these to models of community development, a cornerstone health promotion strategy. In so doing, the paper contributes to the existing literature by providing a theoretical exposition and critique of various threads in social capital discourse, and linking these threads explicitly to community development practice. Distinctions between communitarian, institutional and critical approaches to social capital are elaborated, and the relationships between these three approaches and three models of community development-social planning, locality development, and social action-are discussed. The existing social capital literature is then critically examined in relation to three key themes common to both literatures: community integration, public participation, and power relations. This examination suggests that social capital cannot be conceived in isolation from economic and political structures, since social connections are contingent on, and structured by, access to material resources. This runs counter to many current policy discourses, which focus on the importance of connection and cohesion without addressing fundamental inequities in access to resources. This paper posits that approaches to community development and social capital should emphasise the importance of a conscious concern with social justice. A construction of social capital which explicitly endorses the importance of transformative social engagement, while at the same time recognising the potential negative consequences of social capital development, could help community organizers build communities in ways that truly promote health.
机译:近年来,社会资本一直是学术和政策关注焦点。尽管有这种兴趣,但这个概念仍然没有得到理论化:迫切需要对本文献进行批判性的接触,而不仅仅是总结。本文通过研究社会资本建设的概念和实践中的问题,并将这些问题与社区发展的模式,即健康促进战略的基础联系起来,为社会资本与健康促进之间的关键对话奠定了基础。在此过程中,本文通过提供对社会资本话语中各种线程的理论阐释和批判,并将这些线程与社区发展实践明确联系起来,为现有文献做出了贡献。阐述了社会资本的社区,制度和批判性方法之间的区别,并讨论了这三种方法与社区发展的三种模式之间的关系-社会计划,地方发展和社会行动。然后,针对两种文献共有的三个关键主题,对现有的社会资本文献进行批判性研究:社区融合,公众参与和权力关系。这项研究表明,社会资本不能孤立于经济和政治结构而设想,因为社会联系取决于对物质资源的获取并由其构成。这与许多当前的政策论点背道而驰,当前的政策论点着眼于联系和凝聚力的重要性,而没有解决获取资源方面的根本性不平等现象。本文认为,社区发展和社会资本的方法应强调对社会正义的自觉关注的重要性。明确认可变革性社会参与的重要性,同时认识到社会资本发展的潜在负面影响的社会资本建设,可以帮助社区组织者以真正促进健康的方式建设社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号