首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >How far can complementary and alternative medicine go? The case of chiropractic and homeopathy.
【24h】

How far can complementary and alternative medicine go? The case of chiropractic and homeopathy.

机译:补充医学和替代医学能走多远?整脊和顺势疗法的情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the efforts of two complementary and alternative occupations, chiropractors and homeopaths, to move from the margins to the mainstream in health care in the province of Ontario. We use a variety of theoretical perspectives to understand how health occupations professionalize: the trait functionalist framework, social closure, the system of professions, and the concept of countervailing powers. The research traces the strategies that the leaders of the two groups are employing, as well as the resources they are able to marshal. These are analyzed within the context of the larger institutional and cultural environment. The data are derived from in-person interviews with 16 leaders (10 chiropractic and 6 homeopathic) identified through professional associations, teaching institutions and informants from the groups. The responses were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. We also used archival materials to document what the leaders were telling us. The data revealed four main strategies: (1) improving the quality of educational programs, (2) elevating standards of practice, (3) developing more peer reviewed research, and (4) increasing group cohesion. Although both groups identified similar strategies, the chiropractors were bolstered by more resources as well as state sanctioned regulation. The efforts of the homeopaths were constrained by scarce resources and the absence of self-regulation. In both cases the lack of strong structural support from government and the established health professions played an important role in limiting what was possible. In the future, it may be to the state's advantage to modify the overall shape of health care to include alternative paradigms of healing along with conventional medical care. Such a shift would put complementary and alternative medicine occupations in a better position to advance professionally and become formal elements of the established health care system.
机译:本文研究了脊椎治疗师和顺势疗法这两个互补和替代性职业的努力,这些职业是从安大略省的医疗保健边缘化转变为主流。我们使用各种理论观点来了解卫生职业如何专业化:特质功能主义框架,社会封闭,职业体系以及反补贴概念。该研究追踪了两组领导人采用的策略以及他们可以调动的资源。这些都是在更大的制度和文化环境的背景下进行分析的。数据来自通过专业协会,教学机构和团体内的线人与16位领导人进行的面对面访谈(10位脊椎按摩师和6位顺势疗法)。使用定性内容分析法对响应进行分析。我们还使用了档案材料来记录领导者告诉我们的内容。数据揭示了四个主要策略:(1)提高教育计划的质量;(2)提高实践标准;(3)开展更多的同行评审研究;(4)增强团队凝聚力。尽管两组都确定了类似的策略,但脊椎按摩师得到了更多资源以及国家批准的法规的支持。顺势疗法者的努力受到资源短缺和缺乏自我调节的限制。在这两种情况下,政府和强有力的卫生专业人员缺乏强有力的结构性支持,在限制可能发生的事情中发挥了重要作用。将来,修改医疗保健的总体形状以包括传统医疗保健的替代治疗范例可能对国家有利。这种转变将使补充和替代医学职业处于更好的位置,以在专业上取得进步,并成为已建立的卫生保健系统的正式组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号