首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >The failure of pharmaceuticals and the power of plants: medicinal discourse as a critique of modernity in the Amazon.
【24h】

The failure of pharmaceuticals and the power of plants: medicinal discourse as a critique of modernity in the Amazon.

机译:药品的失败和植物的力量:药用话语是对亚马逊现代性的一种批判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines how caregivers' medicinal discourse serves as an indirect critique of modernization, urbanization and development in the Brazilian Amazon. When caregivers in two peri-urban neighborhoods, Triunfo and Bairro da Luz, discuss medicinal plants they highlight the positive aspects of phytotherapy and associate it with traditional rural lifestyles. In contrast, they tend to emphasize the shortcomings of pharmaceuticals, which they link to modernity and urbanization. This discourse, which juxtaposes plants/tradition/positive with pharmaceuticals/modernegative, contains counterhegemonic commentary about the failures of modernization, urbanization and development. While state sponsored development was supposed to bring prosperity to the Amazon, for many residents, like those in Bairro de Luz and Triunfo, it did not. In fact, some say development made their lives worse, claiming that poverty and poor health are among the prices they have paid. Due to the shortcomings of modernization and urbanization in other areas of their life, caregivers are ambivalent about biomedicine and the pharmaceuticals they associate with it. Moreover, because medicinal plant remedies embody traditional values, asserting they are stronger, more potent, better and more effective, especially in an urban context, is a moral commentary on the shortcomings of modernity. Finally, by insisting that traditional plant remedies are better at curing the health problems that result from modern, urban lifestyles, they are subtly asserting the superiority of tradition over modernity.
机译:本文探讨了看护者的医学话语如何间接地批评了巴西亚马逊地区的现代化,城市化和发展。当Triunfo和Bairro da Luz在两个郊区社区的护理人员讨论药用植物时,他们强调了植物疗法的积极方面,并将其与传统的乡村生活方式联系在一起。相反,他们倾向于强调药品的缺点,它们与现代性和城市化联系在一起。该论述将植物/传统/阳性与药品并置/现代/阴性并列,包含有关现代化,城市化和发展失败的反霸权评论。虽然国家资助的开发原本应该为亚马逊带来繁荣,但对于许多居民(如Bairro de Luz和Triunfo的居民)却没有。实际上,有人说发展使他们的生活变得更糟,声称贫穷和健康不良是他们所付出的代价之一。由于在生活的其他方面缺乏现代化和城市化的缺点,看护者对生物医学及其相关药物存有矛盾。此外,由于药用植物疗法体现了传统价值,因此断言它们更强,更有效,更好和更有效,特别是在城市环境中,这是对现代性缺陷的道义评论。最后,他们坚持认为传统植物疗法能更好地解决现代城市生活方式带来的健康问题,从而巧妙地宣称传统优于现代疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号