首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Questions of trust in health research on social capital: What aspects of personal network social capital do they measure?
【24h】

Questions of trust in health research on social capital: What aspects of personal network social capital do they measure?

机译:对社会资本健康研究的信任问题:他们衡量个人网络社会资本的哪些方面?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Health research on personal social capital has often utilized measures of respondents' perceived trust of others as either a proxy for one's social capital in the absence of more focused measures or as a subjective component of social capital. Little empirical work has evaluated the validity of such practices. We test the construct validity of two trust measures used commonly in health research on social capital—generalized trust and trust of neighbors-with respect to measures of people's general network-, organization-, family-, friend-, and neighborhood-based social capital and the extent to which these two trust measures are associated with self-rated general health and mental health when social capital measures are included in the same models. Analyses of 2008 Canadian General Social Survey data (response rate 57.3%) indicate that generalized trust and trust of neighbors are both positively—yet modestly—associated with measures of several domains of network-based social capital. Both trust measures are positively associated with general and mental health, but these associations remain robust after adjusting for social capital measures. Our findings suggest that (a) trust is conceptually distinct from social capital, (b) trust measures are inadequate proxies for actual personal social networks, and (c) trust measures may only be capturing psychological aspects relevant to—but not indicative of—social capital. Though links between perceived trust and health deserve study, health research on social capital needs to utilize measures of respondents' actual social networks and their inherent resources.
机译:关于个人社会资本的健康研究通常利用受访者对他人的信任度的衡量标准,作为缺乏更集中衡量指标的一个人的社会资本的替代,或作为社会资本的主观组成部分。很少的经验工作评估了这种做法的有效性。我们测试了在社会资本健康研究中常用的两种信任措施(广义信任和邻居信任)的构造效度,以针对基于人的一般网络,组织,家庭,朋友和邻里的社会资本的措施而言以及当同一模型中包含社会资本测度时,这两种信任测度与自我评估的总体健康和心理健康的关联程度。对2008年加拿大一般社会调查数据的分析(答复率为57.3%)表明,普遍信任和对邻居的信任都与基于网络的社会资本的多个域的度量均呈正相关关系,但相对温和。两种信任措施都与总体和精神健康呈正相关,但是在调整了社会资本措施之后,这些关联仍然保持稳健。我们的发现表明:(a)信任在概念上不同于社会资本,(b)信任措施不足以代表实际的个人社交网络,并且(c)信任措施可能仅捕获与社会相关的心理方面,但并不表示社会方面首都。尽管值得信赖的信任与健康之间的联系值得研究,但有关社会资本的健康研究仍需要利用受访者实际社交网络及其固有资源的衡量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号