首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Rewarding altruism: Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives
【24h】

Rewarding altruism: Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives

机译:奖励利他主义:解决公共卫生倡议中的志愿者付费问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lay involvement in public health programmes occurs through formalised lay health worker (LHW) and other volunteer roles. Whether such participation should be supported, or indeed rewarded, by payment is a critical question. With reference to policy in England, UK, this paper argues how framing citizen involvement in health only as time freely given does not account for the complexities of practice, nor intrinsic motivations. The paper reports results on payment drawn from a study of approaches to support lay people in public health roles, conducted in England, 2007-9. The first phase of the study comprised a scoping review of 224 publications, three public hearings and a register of projects. Findings revealed the diversity of approaches to payment, but also the contested nature of the topic. The second phase investigated programme support matters in five case studies of public health projects, which were selected primarily to reflect role types. All five projects involved volunteers, with two utilising forms of payment to support engagement. Interviews were conducted with a sample of project staff, LHWs (paid and unpaid), external partners and service users. Drawing on both lay and professional perspectives, the paper explores how payment relates to social context as well as various motivations for giving, receiving or declining financial support. The findings show that personal costs are not always absorbed, and that there is a potential conflict between financial support, whether sessional payment or expenses, and welfare benefits. In identifying some of the advantages and disadvantages of payment, the paper highlights the complexity of an issue often addressed only superficially. It concludes that, in order to support citizen involvement, fairness and value should be considered alongside pragmatic matters of programme management; however policy conflicts need to be resolved to ensure that employment and welfare rights are maintained.
机译:外行通过正式的外行卫生工作者(LHW)和其他志愿者角色参与公共卫生计划。是否应该通过付款来支持这种参与,或者实际上应该通过支付来奖励这种参与是一个关键的问题。关于英国英格兰的政策,本文认为,仅在自由给予时间的情况下将公民参与健康框架化,并不能说明实践的复杂性或内在动机。该论文报告了在2007-9年度在英格兰进行的关于对支持非专业人士担任公共卫生角色的方法的研究得出的付款结果。研究的第一阶段包括对224种出版物进行范围界定的审查,三场公开听证会和项目注册。调查结果揭示了付款方式的多样性,但也表明了该主题的争议性质。第二阶段在五个公共卫生项目案例研究中调查了计划支持事项,主要是为了反映角色类型而选择的。所有五个项目都涉及志愿者,其中两个利用付款方式来支持参与。与项目人员,LHW(有偿和无偿),外部合作伙伴和服务用户进行了访谈。本文从专业和专业的角度出发,探讨了付款如何与社会环境以及给予,接受或减少财务支持的各种动机相关。研究结果表明,个人成本并不能总是被吸收,并且在财政支持,会议付款或费用与福利之间可能存在冲突。在确定支付的一些优点和缺点时,本文强调了通常仅从表面上解决的问题的复杂性。结论是,为了支持公民的参与,应在计划管理的务实事项中考虑公平和价值;但是,必须解决政策冲突,以确保维持就业和福利权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号