首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Smokers' accounts on the health risks of smoking: why is smoking not dangerous for me?
【24h】

Smokers' accounts on the health risks of smoking: why is smoking not dangerous for me?

机译:吸烟者对吸烟对健康的危害的说法:为什么吸烟对我来说没有危险?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Drawing on qualitative interviews with forty smokers, aged 24-58 years, in Finland, this study aimed to identify key accounts that smokers used to respond to the hegemonic claim that smoking is harmful to health. While the smokers defended themselves in the face of the presumed health risk argument, they both agreed with and challenged the predominant medical and epidemiological discourses. The five most frequently observed account types that the smokers used were: health risk perspective, moderate use is not harmful, counter-evidence, compensatory behaviour, and smoking as the lesser evil. The accounts seemed to have two purposes. First, they served to protect the smokers from self-blame as well as blame from others. The smokers presented themselves as risk-aware and calculating actors, who have nevertheless made their choice to smoke. Second, the smokers tried to convince the interviewers and themselves of the harmlessness and acceptability of their own smoking. The results of the study with respect to smoking further the understanding about the way laypeople make sense of information about health risks that relates directly to their own 'unhealthy' behaviours and how they use this knowledge to justify their behaviour. Based on the findings of our study, we recommend that future anti-smoking campaigns and interventions should take into account and target lay epidemiological health accounts that are applied by smokers themselves. Rather than trying to motivate and persuade smokers to quit with information translated from epidemiological and medical research, the anti-smoking advocates and health promotion specialists should provide answers to the questions that smokers themselves are pondering and answering, too. Consequently, the results can be used in relation to other pleasurable but 'unhealthy' activities, such as unhealthy eating or drinking, by offering insights into how individuals manage to rationalise and maintain activities which the hegemonic public health perspective terms unhealthy.
机译:这项研究基于对芬兰年龄在24-58岁之间的40名吸烟者进行的定性访谈,目的是确定吸烟者用来回应吸烟对健康有害的霸权主义主张的主要说法。吸烟者面对假定的健康风险论据为自己辩护时,他们都同意并质疑主要的医学和流行病学论述。吸烟者最常观察到的五种账户类型是:健康风险角度,适度使用对人体无害,反证,补偿性行为以及吸烟程度较小。这些帐目似乎有两个目的。首先,他们起着保护吸烟者免受自责以及他人自责的作用。吸烟者将自己表现为意识到风险和计算能力的演员,但他们还是选择吸烟。第二,吸烟者试图说服访调员和他们自己吸烟的无害性和可接受性。有关吸烟的研究结果进一步了解了外行人如何理解与自己的“不健康”行为直接相关的健康风险信息,以及他们如何利用这些知识为自己的行为辩护。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议未来的反吸烟运动和干预措施应考虑并针对吸烟者自己应用的非专业流行病学健康状况。反吸烟倡导者和健康促进专家不是试图激励和说服吸烟者戒掉流行病学和医学研究提供的信息,而应该为吸烟者自己也在思考和回答的问题提供答案。因此,通过提供有关个人如何合理化和维持霸权公共卫生观点认为不健康的活动的见解,可以将结果与其他不愉快但不健康的活动(例如不健康的饮食)结合使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号