首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes among Western and non-Western pregnant women in a Dutch urban population
【24h】

Social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes among Western and non-Western pregnant women in a Dutch urban population

机译:荷兰城市人口中西方和非西方孕妇的社会剥夺和围产期不良后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social deprivation is considered a key factor in adverse perinatal outcomes. Rotterdam, the second largest city in The Netherlands, has large inequalities in perinatal health and a high number of deprived neighbourhoods. Social deprivation is measured here through a composite variable: 'Social Index' (SI). We studied the impact of the SI (2008-2009; 5 categories) in terms of perinatal mortality, congenital anomalies, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) and low 5-minute Apgar score as registered in The Netherlands Perinatal Registry (Rotterdam 2000-2007, n = 56,443 singleton pregnancies). We applied ethnic dichotomisation as Western (European/North-American/Australian) vs. Non-Western (all others) ethnicity was expected to interact with the impact of SI. Tests for trend and multilevel regression analysis were applied. Gradually decreasing prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes was observed in Western women from the lowest SI category (low social quality) to the highest SI category (high social quality). In Western women the low-high SI gradient for prevalence of spontaneous preterm birth (per 1000) changed from 57.2 to 34.1, for iatrogenic preterm birth from 35.2 to 19.0, for SGA from 119.6 to 59.4, for low Apgar score from 10.9 to 8.2, and for perinatal mortality from 14.9 to 7.6. These trends were statistically confirmed by Chi2-tests for trend (p < 0.001). For non-Western women such trends were absent. These strong effects for Western women were confirmed by significant odds ratios for almost all adverse perinatal outcomes estimated from multilevel regression analysis. We conclude social deprivation to play a different role among Western vs. non-Western women. Our results suggest that improvements in social quality may improve perinatal outcomes in Western women, but alternative approaches may be necessary for non-Western groups. Suggested explanations for non-Western 'migrant' groups include the presence of 'protective' effects through knowledge systems or intrinsic resilience. Implications concern both general and targeted policies.
机译:社会剥夺被认为是围产期不良后果的关键因素。鹿特丹是荷兰的第二大城市,围产期健康方面存在很大的不平等现象,并且有许多贫困地区。这里的社会剥夺通过一个综合变量“社会指数”(SI)进行衡量。我们研究了围产期死亡率,先天畸形,早产,小胎龄(SGA)和荷兰围产期注册机构(鹿特丹)注册的5分钟Apgar评分低等方面的SI(2008-2009; 5类)的影响2000年至2007年,n = 56,443例单胎妊娠。我们将种族二分法应用是因为西方(欧洲/北美/澳大利亚)与非西方(所有其他)种族被期望与SI的影响相互作用。应用趋势测试和多级回归分析。从最低的SI类别(社会质量低)到最高的SI类别(社会质量高),西方女性的围产期不良结局患病率逐渐降低。在西方女性中,自发性早产患病率的低-高SI梯度(每1000个)从57.2变到34.1,医源性早产从35.2变到19.0,SGA从119.6变到59.4,Apgar低分从10.9到8.2,围产期死亡率从14.9至7.6。这些趋势已通过Chi2-test趋势进行了统计确认(p <0.001)。对于非西方女性,则没有这种趋势。多层回归分析估计,几乎所有不良围产儿结局均具有显着的优势比,证实了对西方女性的这些强大影响。我们得出结论,社会剥夺在西方妇女和非西方妇女中起着不同的作用。我们的结果表明,社会质量的改善可能会改善西方女性的围产期结局,但对于非西方人群则可能需要其他方法。对于非西方“移民”群体的建议解释包括通过知识系统或内在抵御力的“保护”作用的存在。暗示涉及一般政策和针对性政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号