首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Is subjective social status a more important determinant of health than objective social status? Evidence from a prospective observational study of Scottish men.
【24h】

Is subjective social status a more important determinant of health than objective social status? Evidence from a prospective observational study of Scottish men.

机译:主观社会地位比客观社会地位更重要地决定健康吗?来自苏格兰男子的前瞻性观察研究的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Both subjective and objective measures of lower social position have been shown to be associated with poorer health. A psychosocial, as opposed to material, aetiology of health inequalities predicts that subjective social status should be a stronger determinant of health than objective social position. In a workplace based prospective study of 5232 Scottish men recruited in the early 1970s and followed up for 25 years we examined the association between objective and subjective indices of social position, perceived psychological stress, cardiovascular disease risk factors and subsequent health. Lower social position, whether indexed by more objective or more subjective measures, was consistently associated with an adverse profile of established disease risk factors. Perceived stress showed the opposite association. The main subjective social position measure used was based on individual perceptions of workplace status (as well as their actual occupation, men were asked whether they saw themselves as "employees", "foremen", or "managers"). Compared to foremen, employees had a small and imprecisely estimated increased risk of all cause mortality, whereas managers had a more marked decreased risk. The strongest predictors of increased mortality were father's manual as opposed to non-manual occupation; lack of car access and shorter stature, (an indicator of material deprivation in childhood). In the fully adjusted analyses, perceived work-place status was only weakly associated with mortality. In this population it appears that objective material circumstances, particularly in early life, are a more important determinant of health than perceptions of relative status. Conversely, higher perceived stress was not associated with poorer health, presumably because, in this population, higher stress was not associated with material disadvantage. Together these findings suggest that, rather than targeting perceptions of disadvantage and associated negative emotions, interventions to reduce health inequalities should aim to reduce objective material disadvantage, particularly that experienced in early life.
机译:较低的社会地位的主观和客观指标都被证明与健康状况较差有关。与不平等的物质病因相反,心理社会原因学认为,与客观社会地位相比,主观社会地位应是更强的健康决定因素。在一项基于工作场所的前瞻性研究中,对1970年代初期招募的5232名苏格兰男子进行了随访,并随访了25年,我们研究了社会地位的客观和主观指标,感知的心理压力,心血管疾病危险因素和随后的健康之间的关联。较低的社会地位,无论是通过更客观还是更主观的指标来衡量,都与已确定的疾病风险因素的不良状况相关。感知到的压力显示出相反的关联。所采用的主要主观社会地位衡量标准是根据个人对工作场所地位的看法(以及他们的实际职业,询问男人是否将自己视为“雇员”,“领班”或“经理”)。与工头相比,员工因各种原因死亡的风险增加的幅度很小且估计不准确,而管理人员的风险显着降低。死亡率增加的最强预测因素是父亲的手册,而非非体力劳动。缺乏汽车通行和身材矮小(儿童时期物质匮乏的指标)。在完全调整的分析中,感知的工作场所状态与死亡率之间的关系很小。在这一人群中,客观的物质环境,尤其是在早期生活中,似乎是健康状况的重要决定因素,而不是对相对地位的看法。相反,较高的感知压力与健康状况较差无关,大概是因为在该人群中,较高的压力与物质上的劣势无关。这些发现共同表明,减少健康不平等的干预措施,而不是针对不利因素和相关的负面情绪,应以减少客观的物质不利因素为目标,尤其是在早期生活中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号