首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Physicians' perceptions of autonomy across practice types: Is autonomy in solo practice a myth?
【24h】

Physicians' perceptions of autonomy across practice types: Is autonomy in solo practice a myth?

机译:医师对各种练习类型的自主权的理解:独奏练习的自主权是神话吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Physicians in the United States are now less likely to practice in smaller, more traditional, solo practices, and more likely to practice in larger group practices. Though older theory predicts conflict between bureaucracy and professional autonomy, studies have shown that professions in general, and physicians in particular, have adapted to organizational constraints. However, much work remains in clarifying the nature of this relationship and how exactly physicians have adapted to various organizational settings. To this end, the present study examines physicians' autonomy experiences in different decision types between organization sizes. Specifically, I ask: In what kinds of decisions do doctors perceive autonomous controlα How does this vary by organizational sizeα Using stacked "spell" data constructed from the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Physician Survey (1996-2005) (n=16,519) I examine how physicians' perceptions of autonomy vary between solo/two physician practices, small group practices with three to ten physicians, and large practices with ten or more physicians, in two kinds of decisions: logistic-based and knowledge-based decisions. Capitalizing on the longitudinal nature of the data I estimate how changes in practice size are associated with perceptions of autonomy, accounting for previous reports of autonomy. I also test whether managed care involvement, practice ownership, and salaried employment help explain part of this relationship. I find that while physicians practicing in larger group practices reported lower levels of autonomy in logistic-based decisions, physicians in solo/two physician practices reported lower levels of autonomy in knowledge-based decisions. Managed care involvement and ownership explain some, but not all, of the associations. These findings suggest that professional adaptation to various organizational settings can lead to varying levels of perceived autonomy across different kinds of decisions.
机译:现在,美国的医师不太可能采用较小的,更传统的独奏方式,而更有可能采用较大的团体方式。尽管较早的理论预测官僚主义与专业自主权之间会发生冲突,但研究表明,一般的职业,尤其是医生,已经适应了组织的约束。但是,要弄清这种关系的性质以及医生如何准确地适应各种组织环境,还有许多工作要做。为此,本研究考察了组织规模之间不同决策类型下医师的自治经验。具体来说,我想问:医生对自主控制采取哪种决策α随组织规模的不同α使用从社区跟踪研究(CTS)医师调查(1996-2005)构建的堆叠“拼写”数据(n = 16,519)I在以下两种决策中,研究医师对自主权的看法在独奏/两位医师实践,三到十位医师的小组实践以及十位或更多医师的大型实践之间如何变化:基于逻辑的决策和基于知识的决策。利用数据的纵向性质,我估计了实践规模的变化如何与自治感相关联,并考虑了以前的自治报告。我还测试了管理式护理的参与,执业所有权和有薪工作是否有助于解释这种关系的一部分。我发现,虽然从事大型团体执业的医师报告的基于逻辑决策的自主权较低,但是从事单人/两名医师执业的医师的基于知识的决策自主权较低。管理式护理的参与和所有权可以解释其中的一些协会,但不是全部协会。这些发现表明,对各种组织环境的专业适应可以导致不同类型决策之间不同程度的感知自主权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号