...
首页> 外文期刊>Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology >The impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on psychological distress and forgiveness in South Africa.
【24h】

The impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on psychological distress and forgiveness in South Africa.

机译:真相与和解委员会对南非的心理困扰和宽恕的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Legislation to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was passed soon after election of South Africa's first democratic government. Discourse around the TRC focused on the importance of bearing witness to the past, and on the healing powers of forgiveness. However, there was also a concern that individuals with TRC relevant experience would simply be re-traumatized by participation in the process. To date, there has been little empirical data for either hypothesis. METHODS: A nationally representative survey of the South African population (n = 4,351) was undertaken 6-8 years after the TRC process began. Information about subjects' exposure to and participation in the TRC was collected, and views about the testimony of survivors and perpetrators were assessed. To determine the predictors of distress, anger, and forgiveness, linear regressions were undertaken with inclusion of demographic variables, exposure to TRC variables, and attitudes to the TRC. RESULTS: Distress was significantly associated with specific demographic factors (female gender, less education), with having a TRC-related experience to share, and with negative perceptions of the TRC (a negative view of survivors' testimony). Anger had similar associations but was also predicted by lower age. Forgiveness was associated with age and education, with being Coloured, and with having a positive view of perpetrator's testimony, while it was inversely associated with having a TRC experience to share. Distress and anger correlated inversely with forgiveness. Perceptions of the TRC were moderately positive irrespective of many demographic variables (race, education, age). CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study, causal relationships are difficult to ascertain. Nevertheless, relationships between increased distress/anger, having a TRC relevant experience to share, and negative perceptions of the TRC, support a view that bearing testimony is not necessarily helpful to survivors. However, in the population as a whole, moderately positive attitudes towards the TRC across sociodemographic variables support a view that the TRC helped provide knowledge and acknowledgment of the past.
机译:背景:南非选举第一个民主政府后不久,通过了建立真相与和解委员会(TRC)的立法。围绕真相与和解委员会的讨论集中于见证过去的重要性以及宽恕的治愈能力。但是,也有人担心,只有拥有TRC相关经验的个人才能通过参与该过程而再次受到创伤。迄今为止,关于这两种假设的经验数据都很少。方法:TRC程序开始后6至8年,对南非人口(n = 4,351)进行了全国代表性的调查。收集了有关受试者接触真相与和解理论的信息,并评估了关于幸存者和犯罪者证言的观点。为了确定痛苦,愤怒和宽恕的预测因素,进行了线性回归分析,其中包括人口统计学变量,对TRC变量的了解以及对TRC的态度。结果:苦恼与特定的人口统计学因素(女性,受教育程度较低),与TRC相关的经验共享以及对TRC的负面看法(对幸存者的证词的负面看法)显着相关。愤怒也有类似的联想,但年龄也较低。宽恕与年龄和受教育程度,有色,对犯罪者的证言有积极的看法有关,而与分享TRC经验则成反比。苦恼和愤怒与宽恕成反比。不管有多少人口统计学变量(种族,教育程度,年龄),对TRC的看法均为中等。结论:在这项横断面研究中,因果关系很难确定。但是,遇险/愤怒增加,有与TRC相关的经验可以分享和对TRC的负面看法之间的关系支持以下观点:带有证词不一定对幸存者有所帮助。但是,在整个人口中,对跨性别人口统计学在社会人口统计变量中持积极态度的观点支持了这样一种观点,即跨性别人口报告有助于提供对过去的知识和认可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号