【24h】

Layered coded vs. multiple description coded video over error-prone networks

机译:易错网络上的分层编码视频与多描述编码视频

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Layered (LC) and multiple description coding (MDC) have been proposed as source coding techniques that are robust to channel errors for video transmission. LC and MDC have similar characteristics: they both generate multiple sub-bitstreams, and it is permissible to drop some portion of the data from the sub-bitstreams for LC have different levels of both methods. However, they are different in the sense that the sub-bitstreams for LC have different levels of both methods. However, they are different in the sense that the sub-bitstreams for LC have different levels of importance while all sub-bitstreams for MDC are equally important. Since these two encoding techniques have similar properties, some performance comparisons between LC and MDC have recently been reported. However, these studies are still not conclusive because several scenarios have not been carefully considered. Furthermore, they have been performed in different environments. In this paper, we further investigate the error-resilience capabilities of these two encoding techniques through extensive experimentation. Although some of our conclusions agree with those in the literature, we believe that this paper provides the most comprehensive performance comparison yet between LC and MDC.
机译:已提出分层(LC)和多描述编码(MDC)作为对视频传输的信道错误具有鲁棒性的源编码技术。 LC和MDC具有相似的特性:它们都生成多个子比特流,并且对于LC两种方法都不同的级别,允许从子比特流中删除部分数据。但是,它们在某种意义上是不同的,即LC的子位流具有两种方法的不同级别。但是,它们的区别在于LC的子位流具有不同的重要性级别,而MDC的所有子位流同等重要。由于这两种编码技术具有相似的属性,因此最近已报告了LC和MDC之间的一些性能比较。但是,由于尚未仔细考虑几种情况,因此这些研究仍不是结论性的。此外,它们已在不同的环境中执行。在本文中,我们将通过广泛的实验进一步研究这两种编码技术的容错能力。尽管我们的某些结论与文献中的结论一致,但我们认为本文提供了LC和MDC之间迄今为止最全面的性能比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号