首页> 外文期刊>Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography >Collaborating in the field, working for change: Reflecting on partnerships between academics, development organizations and rural communities in Africa
【24h】

Collaborating in the field, working for change: Reflecting on partnerships between academics, development organizations and rural communities in Africa

机译:在实地合作,为变革而努力:反思非洲学者,发展组织与农村社区之间的伙伴关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Academics and development organizations approach fieldwork with somewhat different motivations, constraints and challenges. In many instances, fieldwork might be improved if greater collaboration occurred between these two parties. Rural communities are also important yet frequently taken for granted partners in the research process that deserve greater respect. This paper explores and describes the real and imagined impediments to greater collaboration between academics, development organizations and rural communities. The findings are based on 18 years of working with rural communities in Africa, both as a development practitioner and academic researcher. This reflection makes three contributions to the broader literature on fieldwork. First, it explicitly links two ongoing discussions, one on relationships with institutional partners, the other on interactions with rural communities. Second, it articulates the concerns of development organizations in their partnerships with academic researchers, a perspective rarely heard in a literature dominated by academic voices. Third, while feminist scholarship on fieldwork methods often wrestles with issues of positionality and engagement at the scale of the individual researcher, this reflection is aimed at the broader scale of the professional (academic and practitioner) communities involved in development praxis and scholarship.
机译:学术界和发展组织以不同的动机,局限性和挑战来进行野外工作。在许多情况下,如果这两方之间进行更大程度的合作,可能会改善野外工作。农村社区也很重要,但在研究过程中经常被视为理所当然的合作伙伴,值得更多的尊重。本文探讨并描述了学者,发展组织和农村社区之间更大合作的现实和想象中的障碍。这些发现基于18年与非洲农村社区的发展从业人员和学术研究人员的合作。这种反思为实地考察的更广泛文献做出了三点贡献。首先,它明确地将两个正在进行的讨论联系在一起,一个讨论与机构伙伴的关系,另一个讨论与农村社区的互动。其次,它阐明了发展组织与学术研究人员建立伙伴关系时所关注的问题,这种观点在以学术声音为主导的文献中很少听到。第三,尽管关于田野调查方法的女权主义奖学金经常在单个研究者的规模上与地位和参与问题相关,但这种思考的目的是针对参与发展实践和奖学金的专业(学术界和从业者)社区的更大范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号