QUAD review should have avoided subjective tests

Ranald Grant

首页> 外文期刊>Silicon Chip >QUAD review should have avoided subjective tests

【24h】

QUAD review should have avoided subjective tests

机译：QUAD审查应避免主观测试

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

团队文献服务 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Thanks for the great write-up on the QUAD equipment in the August 2010 issue. As a long-time audio enthusiast I find these sorts of articles very interesting and more would be very welcome if the opportunity arises. I would be very pleased to end up with a set of QUAD equipment that was in as good condition as this collection appears to be. The descriptions and tests and comparisons were really good, however I would like to make some comments.

机译：感谢您在2010年8月号上对QUAD设备所做的出色撰写。作为长期的音频发烧友，我发现这些文章非常有趣，如果有机会，还会受到更多欢迎。最后，我将很高兴得到一套QUAD设备，该设备的状态与该系列产品一样良好。描述，测试和比较确实不错，但是我想提一些意见。

著录项

来源
《Silicon Chip 》 |2010年第10期| 共3页
作者
Ranald Grant;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类无线电电子学、电信技术 ;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. QUAD review should have avoided subjective tests [J] . Ranald Grant Silicon Chip . 2010 ,第10期

机译：QUAD审查应避免主观测试
2. Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings: Part Ⅲ—airborne sound data associated with subjective responses in laboratory tests [J] . Nikolaos-Georgios Vardaxis, Delphine Bard Building acoustics . 2018 ,第4期

机译：住宅声学舒适性评估的回顾：第三部分–与实验室测试中的主观反应相关的航空声数据
3. Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings: part Ⅱ-impact sound data associated with subjective responses in laboratory tests [J] . Nikolaos-Georgios Vardaxis, Delphine Bard Building acoustics . 2018 ,第2期

机译：住宅声学舒适性评估综述：第二部分-与实验室测试中的主观反应相关的声音数据
4. Does the method matter? A review of the main testing methods for the subjective evaluation of room acoustics through listening tests [C] . Daniel DE LA PRIDA, Antonio PEDRERO, Luis A. AZPICUETA-RUIZ, International Congress on Acoustics . 2020

机译：方法是否重要？通过聆听测试对房间声学主观评估的主要检测方法综述
5. The Quadrennial Defense Review: Analyzing the major defense review process. [D] . Gordon, John, IV. 2005

机译：四年防务评估：分析主要的国防评估程序。
6. Objective sensory testing methods reveal a higher prevalence of olfactory loss in COVID-19–positive patients compared to subjective methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Mackenzie E. Hannum, Vicente A. Ramirez, Sarah J. Lipson,
7. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines) 11The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.22This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in July 2002 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in June 2002. When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, Mark DB, McCallister BD, Mooss AN, O’Reilly MG, Winters WL Jr. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.33Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. Ask for reprint No. 71-0231. To obtain a copy of the Executive Summary published in the October 1, 2002 issue of Circulation, ask for reprint No. 71-0232. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.44(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.)55©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gibbons Raymond J, Balady Gary J, Timothy Bricker J, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA 2002年运动测试指南更新：摘要文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会对1997年运动测试指南进行了更新）11ACC / AHA实践指南工作组使每一个努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组进行审查，在第一次会议上向书面小组的所有成员口头报告，并在发生变化时进行更新。22本文件于2002年7月获得美国心脏病学会基金会理事会的批准。美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会于2002年6月提出。引用该文件时，美国心脏病学会基金会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Gibbons RJ，Balady GJ，Bricker JT，Chaitman BR，Fletcher GF， Froelicher VF，Mark DB，McCalister BD，Mooss AN，O'Reilly MG，Winters WL Jr.ACC / AHA 2002锻炼测试指南更新：摘要文章：ACC / AHA实践指南工作组的报告（更新委员会）（1997年运动测试指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1531–40.33副本：该文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。可以通过致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心（位于贝塞斯达，乔治市老街9111号，马里兰州20814-1699）来获得完整指南的单个副本。要求转载第71-0231号。要获得发表在2002年10月1日的《发行》上的《执行摘要》，请索阅第71-0232号。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或电子邮件kbradle@lww.com.44（美国运筹学杂志，2002； 40：1531–40。）55©2002心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司

QUAD review should have avoided subjective tests

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅